Literature DB >> 22807594

Practice audits to reduce caesareans in a tertiary referral hospital in south-western China.

Ma Runmei1, Lao Terence T, Sun Yonghu, Xiao Hong, Tian Yuqin, Li Bailuan, Yang Minghui, Yang Weihong, Liang Kun, Liang Guohua, Li Hongyu, Geng Li, Ni Renmin, Qi Wenjin, Chen Zhuo, Du Mingyu, Zhu Bei, Xu Jing, Tao Yanping, Zhang Lan, Song Xianyan, Qu Zaiqing, Sun Qian, Yi Xiaoyun, Yu Jihui, Zhang Dandan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a three-stage intervention to reduce caesarean deliveries in a Chinese tertiary hospital.
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to assess whether educating staff, educating patients and auditing surgeon practices (introduced in 2005) had reduced caesarean delivery rates. Multiple logistic regression was used to check for a potential association between caesarean rates and rates of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).
FINDINGS: The caesarean delivery rate ranged from 53.5% to 56.1% in 2001-2004 and from 43.9% to 36.1% in 2005-2011. When 2001-2004 and 2005-2011 were treated as "before" and "after" periods to evaluate the intervention's impact on the mean caesarean section rate, a significant reduction was noted: from 54.8% to 40.3% (odds ratio, OR: 0.56; 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.52-0.59; χ(2) test: P < 0.001). The overall drop in the caesarean section rate was significant (χ(2) test: P < 0.001) and inversely correlated with the years (Spearman's ρ: -0.096; P < 0.001). Although complicated pregnancies increased after 2004, the primary caesarean section rate decreased annually by 20% on average in 2005-2011, after practice audits were implemented. Multiple logistic regression showed a positive association between the caesarean delivery rate and the rate of admission to the NICU (adjusted OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.14-1.40).
CONCLUSION: Patient and staff education and practice audits reduced the Caesarean section rate in a tertiary referral hospital without an increase in admissions to the NICU.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22807594      PMCID: PMC3397701          DOI: 10.2471/BLT.11.093369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull World Health Organ        ISSN: 0042-9686            Impact factor:   9.408


  23 in total

1.  Mode of delivery and risk of respiratory diseases in newborns.

Authors:  E M Levine; V Ghai; J J Barton; C M Strom
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Estimating the proportion of unnecessary Cesarean sections in Ohio using birth certificate data.

Authors:  S M Koroukian; B Trisel; A A Rimm
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Economic aspects of caesarean section and alternative modes of delivery.

Authors:  S Petrou; J Henderson; C Glazener
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.237

4.  Rising cesarean delivery rate in primiparous women in urban China: evidence from three nationwide household health surveys.

Authors:  Shenglan Tang; Xiaoyan Li; Zhuochun Wu
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Association of caesarean delivery for first birth with placenta praevia and placental abruption in second pregnancy.

Authors:  Q Yang; S W Wen; L Oppenheimer; X K Chen; D Black; J Gao; M C Walker
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Factors related to the high cesarean section rate and their effects on the "price transparency policy" in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Xie Hong
Journal:  Tohoku J Exp Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  In-hospital maternal mortality in the United States: time trends and relation to method of delivery.

Authors:  D B Petitti; R C Cefalo; S Shapiro; P Whalley
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  How safe is caesarean section in current practice? A survey of mortality and serious morbidity.

Authors:  S Broe; S K Khoo
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.100

Review 9.  Measuring the quality of inpatient obstetrical care.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bailit
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.347

10.  Does delivery mode affect women's postpartum quality of life in rural China?

Authors:  Kun Huang; Fangbiao Tao; Liu Liu; Xiaoyan Wu
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.036

View more
  15 in total

1.  Modeling the intention to choose natural vaginal delivery: using reasoned action and social cognitive theories.

Authors:  Safieh Kanani; Hamid Allahverdipour; Mohammad AsghariJafarabadi
Journal:  Health Promot Perspect       Date:  2015-03-29

2.  Early third trimester maternal response to glucose challenge and pregnancy outcome in Chinese women-relationship between upper distribution level and recommended diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  M Y Du; R M Ma; T T-H Lao; Z Chen; H Xiao; Y Q Tian; B L Li; K Liang; L Zhang; M H Yang; J Li; H Li; R Yan; L Geng; W J Qi; H Y Li; J Xu; S Q Hu; G H Liang; J H Yu
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Combined laparoscopy and hysteroscopy vs. uterine curettage in the uterine artery embolization-based management of cesarean scar pregnancy: a cohort study.

Authors:  Xin Wu; Xiaohong Xue; Xuezhe Wu; Ru Lin; Ying Yuan; Qing Wang; Congjian Xu; Yifeng He; Weiguo Hu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-09-15

Review 4.  What Are Optimal Cesarean Section Rates in the U.S. and How Do We Get There? A Review of Evidence-Based Recommendations and Interventions.

Authors:  Diana Montoya-Williams; Dominick J Lemas; Lisa Spiryda; Keval Patel; Josef Neu; Tiffany L Carson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 5.  Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.

Authors:  Innie Chen; Newton Opiyo; Emma Tavender; Sameh Mortazhejri; Tamara Rader; Jennifer Petkovic; Sharlini Yogasingam; Monica Taljaard; Sugandha Agarwal; Malinee Laopaiboon; Jason Wasiak; Suthit Khunpradit; Pisake Lumbiganon; Russell L Gruen; Ana Pilar Betran
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-09-28

6.  The relationship between midwife-led group-based versus conventional antenatal care and mode of birth: a matched cohort study.

Authors:  Lauren Kearney; Mary Kynn; Alison Craswell; Rachel Reed
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Relaxation of the one child policy and trends in caesarean section rates and birth outcomes in China between 2012 and 2016: observational study of nearly seven million health facility births.

Authors:  Juan Liang; Yi Mu; Xiaohong Li; Wen Tang; Yanping Wang; Zheng Liu; Xiaona Huang; Robert W Scherpbier; Sufang Guo; Mingrong Li; Li Dai; Kui Deng; Changfei Deng; Qi Li; Leni Kang; Jun Zhu; Carine Ronsmans
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-03-05

8.  Persuading Iranian Women toward Normal Vaginal Delivery: Using Pictorial Perception of the Labour Process.

Authors:  Safieh Kananikandeh
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2018-06-06

Review 9.  Cesarean section in the People's Republic of China: current perspectives.

Authors:  Xing Lin Feng; Ying Wang; Lin An; Carine Ronsmans
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-01-09

10.  Combined laparoscopy and hysteroscopy vs. uterine curettage in the uterine artery embolization-based management of cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yifeng He; Xin Wu; Qiujing Zhu; Xuezhe Wu; Lingda Feng; Xia Wu; Aimin Zhao; Wen Di
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.