Literature DB >> 7062280

Multiple drug training as a method for increasing the specificity of the drug discrimination procedure.

D A Overton.   

Abstract

In a two-lever appetitively reinforced bar-pressing task, one group of rats learned a phenobarbital vs. saline discrimination. Groups 2 to 4 were reinforced for pressing one lever when given phenobarbital and for pressing the other level when given saline or any one of three drugs. In Group 2, the other drugs were the stimulants amphetamine, cocaine and bemegride. In Group 3, the other drugs lacked either strong stimulant or depressant effects (fentanyl, nicotine and cyclazocine). In Group 4, the other drugs were the depressants ethanol, chlordiazepoxide and ketamine. All rats learned the required multiple drug (phenobarbital vs. other) discrimination after one to four training sessions per drug. After discrimination training was completed, tests for substitution with various depressant drugs showed that the degree to which these drugs substituted for phenobarbital differed greatly across groups. Substitution was most complete in rats trained with phenobarbital vs. saline and least complete when the other training drugs were depressants. The results indicate that the degree of specificity produced by phenobarbital vs. other drug discrimination training can be systematically altered by varying the drugs included in the other category.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7062280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  14 in total

1.  The discriminative stimulus effects of dopamine D2- and D3-preferring agonists in rats.

Authors:  Mikhail N Koffarnus; Benjamin Greedy; Stephen M Husbands; Peter Grundt; Amy Hauck Newman; James H Woods
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-09-21       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  A comparison of testing procedures on the discriminative morphine stimulus.

Authors:  G L Kaempf; M J Kallman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Effects of single or multiple choice trials per session on drug discrimination performance.

Authors:  A Tomie; L Peoples; G C Wagner
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Drug Discrimination and the Analysis of Private Events.

Authors:  Brian D Kangas; David R Maguire
Journal:  Behav Anal (Wash D C)       Date:  2016-03-14

5.  Drug discrimination training with a single choice trial per session.

Authors:  A Tomie; E Loukas; I Stafford; L Peoples; G C Wagner
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Trends in drug discrimination research analysed with a cross-indexed bibliography, 1982-1983.

Authors:  I P Stolerman; P J Shine
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Psilocybin as a discriminative stimulus: lack of specificity in an animal behavior model for 'hallucinogens'.

Authors:  J Koerner; J B Appel
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Discrimination of an amphetamine-pentobarbitone mixture by rats in an AND-OR paradigm.

Authors:  I P Stolerman; E A Mariathasan
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  The chlordiazepoxide/pentylenetetrazol discrimination: characterization of drug interactions and homeostatic responses to drug challenges.

Authors:  R C Michaelis; A M Holohean; J R Criado; R D Harland; G A Hunter; F A Holloway
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Discriminable effects of phencyclidine analogs evaluated by multiple drug (PCP versus OTHER) discrimination training.

Authors:  D A Overton; C F Shen; G Y Ke; L P Gazdick
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.