Literature DB >> 3103159

A comparison of testing procedures on the discriminative morphine stimulus.

G L Kaempf, M J Kallman.   

Abstract

The study investigated the effects of reinforcement and non-reinforcement during test sessions, and the effects of duration of generalization test sessions on the generalization of a morphine-induced discriminative stimulus. Rats were trained to discriminate 3 mg/kg morphine from saline in a two-lever drug discrimination task and were then tested for generalization of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 mg/kg morphine with the training drug under both reinforced and non-reinforced contingencies during 4-min test periods. The percentage of drug-appropriate responses and response rates were recorded for the first 2 min and the second 2 min of each test session. A higher proportion of drug-appropriate responding occurred with an intermediate dose of morphine when reinforcement was available during test sessions. The frequency of responding was higher during the last 2 min than during the first 2 min of reinforced test sessions. The changes in response rate observed between the first 2 min and the last 2 min of the test sessions also depended on the reinforcement contingency available and the dose of morphine administered presession. The testing parameters thus altered the degree of generalization and the shape of the generalization curve of the morphine discrimination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3103159     DOI: 10.1007/bf00690927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  16 in total

1.  Behaviorally induced sensitivity to the discriminable properties of LSD.

Authors:  I Greenberg; D M Kuhn; J B Appel
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1975-09-17

2.  Theoretical and methodological considerations on drug discrimination learning.

Authors:  F C Colpaert; C J Niemegeers; P A Janssen
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1976-03-16

Review 3.  Experimental methods for the study of state-dependent learning.

Authors:  D A Overton
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1974-07

4.  A description of the nicotine stimulus and tests of its generalization to amphetamine.

Authors:  W T Chance; D Murfin; G M Krynock; J A Rosecrans
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1977-11-24       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  C.N.S. effect of nicotine as the discriminative stimulus for the rat in a T-maze.

Authors:  M D Schechter; J A Rosecrans
Journal:  Life Sci I       Date:  1971-07-15

6.  Generalization by rats of alcohol and atropine stimulus characteristics to other drugs.

Authors:  R K Kubena; H Barry
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1969

7.  Extended schedule transfer of ethanol discrimination.

Authors:  M D Schechter
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.533

8.  The role of fentanyl training dose and of the alternative stimulus condition in drug generalization.

Authors:  W Koek; J L Slangen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Discriminative response control produced with hashish, tetrahydrocannabinols (delta 8-THC and delta 9-THC), and other drugs.

Authors:  T U Järbe; B G Henriksson
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1974

10.  Characteristics of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-produced discrimination in rats.

Authors:  T U Järbe; J O Johansson; B G Henriksson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1976-07-28       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  4 in total

1.  Trends in drug discrimination research analysed with a cross-indexed bibliography, 1984-1987.

Authors:  I P Stolerman; F Rasul; P J Shine
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Drug discrimination: stimulus control during repeated testing in extinction.

Authors:  T J Zarcone; N A Ator
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  In a drug discrimination procedure isolation-reared rats generalize to lower doses of cocaine and amphetamine than rats reared in an enriched environment.

Authors:  S C Fowler; J S Johnson; M J Kallman; J R Liou; M C Wilson; A H Hikal
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine in rats trained under different schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  I P Stolerman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.