Literature DB >> 3927359

Drug discrimination training with a single choice trial per session.

A Tomie, E Loukas, I Stafford, L Peoples, G C Wagner.   

Abstract

All drug discrimination procedures share in common the practice of providing for multiple choice opportunities per training session. This practice allows nondrug cues (presence or absence of reinforcement) to mediate choice behavior during that portion of the session following the initial choice. Investigators who have acknowledged this problem typically use only first-trial choice performance to evaluate discriminative control by the drug cue, and consider additional choice training following the delivery or nondelivery of the first reinforcer to be facilitatory in establishing drug-mediated discriminative control. In this experiment, rats were trained to discriminate 4.0 mg/kg morphine from saline in a novel procedure that employed a single choice trial per training session. Choice performance was characterized during discrimination acquisition and in subsequent stimulus generalization testing. The results indicated that when all reinforcers are made contingent on correct performance during a single choice trial, rapid and stable control of drug-mediated choice behavior, is observed. In addition, the results demonstrated that additional choice training following the delivery or nondelivery of the first reinforcer is not a necessary antecedent toward establishing drug-mediated discriminative control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3927359     DOI: 10.1007/bf00431713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  22 in total

Review 1.  Experimental methods for the study of state-dependent learning.

Authors:  D A Overton
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1974-07

2.  Measurement of stimulus control during discriminative operant conditioning.

Authors:  H M Jenkins
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 3.  Behavioral methods for the study of drug interactions.

Authors:  C R Schuster
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 4.  Discriminative stimulus effects of narcotics: evidence for multiple receptor-mediated actions.

Authors:  S Herling; J H Woods
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1981-04-06       Impact factor: 5.037

5.  Factors regulating drug cue sensitivity: limits of discriminability and the role of a progressively decreasing training dose in fentanyl-saline discrimination.

Authors:  F C Colpaert; C J Niemegeers; P A Janssen
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 4.030

6.  Analyzing mechanism(s) of hallucinogenic drug action with drug discrimination procedures.

Authors:  J B Appel; F J White; A M Holohean
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Stimulus properties of opioids with mixed agonist and antagonist activity.

Authors:  S G Holtzman
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1982-05

8.  The discriminative stimulus properties of cyclazocine: generalization studies involving nalorphine, morphine and LSD.

Authors:  J A Rosecrans; W T Chance; R M Spencer
Journal:  Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol       Date:  1978-05

9.  Pentazocine, cyclazocine, and nalorphine as discriminative stimuli.

Authors:  I D Hirschhorn
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1977-11-15       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Stereoisomers of N-allylnormetazocine: phencyclidine-like behavioral effects in squirrel monkeys and rats.

Authors:  K T Brady; R L Balster; E L May
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-01-08       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effects of single or multiple choice trials per session on drug discrimination performance.

Authors:  A Tomie; L Peoples; G C Wagner
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Trends in drug discrimination research analysed with a cross-indexed bibliography, 1984-1987.

Authors:  I P Stolerman; F Rasul; P J Shine
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Similarities between the stimulus properties of phenylpropanolamine and amphetamine.

Authors:  F Lee; I Stafford; B G Hoebel
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Quantal detection and homogeneous sensitivity in a pentylenetetrazol discrimination.

Authors:  C M Harris; M W Emmett-Oglesby; D A Mathis; H Lal
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.530

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.