Literature DB >> 3114806

Effects of single or multiple choice trials per session on drug discrimination performance.

A Tomie, L Peoples, G C Wagner.   

Abstract

Drug discrimination procedures typically provide for multiple choice opportunities per training session. This practice allows non-drug cues (presence or absence of reinforcement) to mediate choice behavior during that portion of the session following the initial choice. In this experiment, rats were trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg cyclazocine from saline using a novel procedure that employed a single-choice trial per training session. Drug discrimination acquisition and generalization were compared to those of rats given discrimination training with 30 choice trials per session. The one-trial procedure yielded stable and reliable acquisition but more slowly than did the multiple trials procedure. The one-trial procedure produced longer first trial choice latencies and enhanced the tendency for subjects to respond on both choice levers during the first trial. The cyclazocine generalization functions were comparable, but the one-trial subjects more often responded on both choice levers, particularly when administered intermediate test doses of cyclazocine. Control of choice behavior by the reinforcer cue was evaluated on a mid-session cue reversal test. Multiple-trial subjects persisted in responding on the saline level following a mid-session injection of cyclazocine, whereas one-trial subjects shifted to the cyclazocine-appropriate lever.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3114806     DOI: 10.1007/bf00176490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  13 in total

1.  Measurement of stimulus control during discriminative operant conditioning.

Authors:  H M Jenkins
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Drug discrimination training with a single choice trial per session.

Authors:  A Tomie; E Loukas; I Stafford; L Peoples; G C Wagner
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Behavioral methods for the study of drug interactions.

Authors:  C R Schuster
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 4.  Discriminative stimulus effects of narcotics: evidence for multiple receptor-mediated actions.

Authors:  S Herling; J H Woods
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1981-04-06       Impact factor: 5.037

5.  Differential haloperidol effect on two indices of fentanyl-saline discrimination.

Authors:  F C Colpaert; C J Niemegeers; P A Janssen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1977-07-18       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Multiple drug training as a method for increasing the specificity of the drug discrimination procedure.

Authors:  D A Overton
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Discriminative stimulus effects of cyclazocine in the rat.

Authors:  J J Teal; S G Holtzman
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 4.030

8.  Discriminative effects of morphine in the pigeon.

Authors:  T U Järbe
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 3.533

9.  Phencyclidine discrimination in the pigeon using color tracking under second-order schedule.

Authors:  D E McMillan; D A Cole-Fullenwider; W C Hardwick; G R Wenger
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Pentazocine, cyclazocine, and nalorphine as discriminative stimuli.

Authors:  I D Hirschhorn
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1977-11-15       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.