Literature DB >> 7058491

Increased burn patient survival with individualized dosages of gentamicin.

D E Zaske, J L Bootman, L B Solem, R G Strate.   

Abstract

The clinical effect of measuring serum gentamicin concentrations and individualizing each patient's dosage regimen was determined 105 burn patients with severe gram-negative sepsis. Thirty-nine patients (conventionally dosed group) received the recommended dosage regimen of 3 to 5 mg/kg/day from 1972 to 1974. From 1974 to 1976, serum concentrations were measured in 66 patients (individually dosed group), and each patient's dose was individually calculated to obtain therapeutic serum concentrations. All patients had normal renal function prior to initiation of gentamicin therapy. For each group, 16 independent variables were compared that may have influenced treatment response. The patients in the individually dosed group required an average dose of 7.4 mg/kg/day to achieve therapeutic concentrations, compared to the average dose of 4.4 mg/kg/day for the patients receiving conventional doses (P less than 0.001). An abrupt increase in patient survival occurred with the implementation of individualized regimens. Patient survival rates for the entire hospital course were 33% and 64% for the conventionally dosed and individually dosed groups, respectively (P less than 0.005). Survival rates for the first septic episode were 51.3% and 86.4%, respectively (P less than 0.001). Individualized gentamicin regimens, age, percent burn, and sex were the statistically significant variables related to patient survival for the first episode of sepsis. Age, percent burn, individualized dosing, complications during hospitalization, and a positive blood culture were significant factors related to patient survival for the entire hospital course. These data confirm the need for measuring serum gentamicin concentrations and adjusting dosages to ensure therapeutic levels and maximal efficacy of gentamicin in burn patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7058491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  18 in total

1.  Population pharmacokinetics of arbekacin in burn patients.

Authors:  Jong Hyun Kim; Hyon-Oh Lah; Dong-Seok Yim
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 2.  Methods of minimising the cost of aminoglycoside therapy to hospitals.

Authors:  C A Gentry; K A Rodvold; J S Bertino
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  The economic potential of dual individualisation methodologies.

Authors:  J A Paladino; G S Zimmer; J J Schentag
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Clinical pharmacokinetics in the 21st century. Does the evidence support definitive outcomes?

Authors:  M H Ensom; G A Davis; C D Cropp; R J Ensom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Pharmacokinetics of cefepime in patients with thermal burn injury.

Authors:  C R Bonapace; R L White; L V Friedrich; E D Norcross; J A Bosso
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Therapeutic drug monitoring in oncology. Problems and potential in antineoplastic therapy.

Authors:  M J Moore; C Erlichman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Aztreonam pharmacokinetics in burn patients.

Authors:  L V Friedrich; R L White; M B Kays; D M Brundage; D Yarbrough
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Model-based, goal-oriented, individualised drug therapy. Linkage of population modelling, new 'multiple model' dosage design, bayesian feedback and individualised target goals.

Authors:  R W Jelliffe; A Schumitzky; D Bayard; M Milman; M Van Guilder; X Wang; F Jiang; X Barbaut; P Maire
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Experience with brulamycin therapy in dialysed patients.

Authors:  L Löcsey; E Faragó; G Kakuk
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Comparison of Sawchuk-Zaske and Bayesian forecasting for aminoglycosides in seriously ill patients.

Authors:  C P Denaro; P J Ravenscroft
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.