Literature DB >> 9474473

Model-based, goal-oriented, individualised drug therapy. Linkage of population modelling, new 'multiple model' dosage design, bayesian feedback and individualised target goals.

R W Jelliffe1, A Schumitzky, D Bayard, M Milman, M Van Guilder, X Wang, F Jiang, X Barbaut, P Maire.   

Abstract

This article examines the use of population pharmacokinetic models to store experiences about drugs in patients and to apply that experience to the care of new patients. Population models are the Bayesian prior. For truly individualised therapy, it is necessary first to select a specific target goal, such as a desired serum or peripheral compartment concentration, and then to develop the dosage regimen individualised to best hit that target in that patient. One must monitor the behaviour of the drug by measuring serum concentrations or other responses, hopefully obtained at optimally chosen times, not only to see the raw results, but to also make an individualised (Bayesian posterior) model of how the drug is behaving in that patient. Only then can one see the relationship between the dose and the absorption, distribution, effect and elimination of the drug, and the patient's clinical sensitivity to it; one must always look at the patient. Only by looking at both the patient and the model can it be judged whether the target goal was correct or needs to be changed. The adjusted dosage regimen is again developed to hit that target most precisely starting with the very next dose, not just for some future steady state. Nonparametric population models have discrete, not continuous, parameter distributions. These lead naturally into the multiple model method of dosage design, specifically to hit a desired target with the greatest possible precision for whatever past experience and present data are available on that drug--a new feature for this goal-oriented, model-based, individualised drug therapy. As clinical versions of this new approach become available from several centers, it should lead to further improvements in patient care, especially for bacterial and viral infections, cardiovascular therapy, and cancer and transplant situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9474473     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199834010-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  24 in total

Review 1.  Individualising gentamicin dosage regimens. A comparative review of selected models, data fitting methods and monitoring strategies.

Authors:  R W Jelliffe; T Iglesias; A K Hurst; K A Foo; J Rodriguez
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Application of a Bayesian method to monitor and adjust vancomycin dosage regimens.

Authors:  A K Hurst; M A Yoshinaga; G H Mitani; K A Foo; R W Jelliffe; E C Harrison
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Nonparametric estimation of population characteristics of the kinetics of lithium from observational and experimental data: individualization of chronic dosing regimen using a new Bayesian approach.

Authors:  N Taright; F Mentré; A Mallet; R Jouvent
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.681

4.  Bayesian individualization of pharmacokinetics: simple implementation and comparison with non-Bayesian methods.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; S L Beal
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 3.534

5.  Does accepting pharmacokinetic recommendations impact hospitalization? A cost-benefit analysis.

Authors:  C J Destache; S K Meyer; K M Rowley
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.681

6.  Impact of a clinical pharmacokinetic service on patients treated with aminoglycosides: a cost-benefit analysis.

Authors:  C J Destache; S K Meyer; M J Bittner; K G Hermann
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.681

7.  Clinical studies with computer-assisted initial lidocaine therapy.

Authors:  J H Rodman; R W Jelliffe; E Kolb; D B Tuey; M F de Guzman; P W Wagers; L J Haywood
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1984-04

8.  Increased burn patient survival with individualized dosages of gentamicin.

Authors:  D E Zaske; J L Bootman; L B Solem; R G Strate
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 9.  Geographical/interracial differences in polymorphic drug oxidation. Current state of knowledge of cytochromes P450 (CYP) 2D6 and 2C19.

Authors:  L Bertilsson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  The population approach to pharmacokinetic data analysis: rationale and standard data analysis methods.

Authors:  L B Sheiner
Journal:  Drug Metab Rev       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.518

View more
  41 in total

1.  Target concentration intervention: beyond Y2K.

Authors:  N H Holford
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of antiarrhythmic drugs.

Authors:  Gesche Jürgens; Niels A Graudal; Jens P Kampmann
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Parametric and nonparametric population methods.

Authors:  Johannes H Proost; Douglas J Eleveld
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.

Authors:  Aida Bustad; Dimiter Terziivanov; Robert Leary; Ruediger Port; Alan Schumitzky; Roger Jelliffe
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Performance of an iterative two-stage bayesian technique for population pharmacokinetic analysis of rich data sets.

Authors:  Johannes H Proost; Douglas J Eleveld
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 6.  Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the newer fluoroquinolone antibacterials.

Authors:  A Aminimanizani; P Beringer; R Jelliffe
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Evaluation and comparison of simple multiple model, richer data multiple model, and sequential interacting multiple model (IMM) Bayesian analyses of gentamicin and vancomycin data collected from patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery.

Authors:  Iona Macdonald; Christine E Staatz; Roger W Jelliffe; Alison H Thomson
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.681

8.  Are vancomycin trough concentrations adequate for optimal dosing?

Authors:  Michael N Neely; Gilmer Youn; Brenda Jones; Roger W Jelliffe; George L Drusano; Keith A Rodvold; Thomas P Lodise
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Community-based parenteral anti-infective therapy (CoPAT). Pharmacokinetic and monitoring issues.

Authors:  D N Williams; J L Raymond
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Impact of CYP2D6 genetic polymorphism on tramadol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Siew Hua Gan; Rusli Ismail; Wan Aasim Wan Adnan; Wan Zulmi
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.074

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.