Literature DB >> 10164056

The economic potential of dual individualisation methodologies.

J A Paladino1, G S Zimmer, J J Schentag.   

Abstract

Cost-effective treatment of patients with bacterial infections can best be accomplished by facilitating a rapid response. Achieving a more rapid cure of the infection should result in reduced utilisation of healthcare resources. An innovative means of achieving a more rapid response to antibacterial therapy has been termed dual individualisation. Dual individualisation allows for the simultaneous consideration of the pharmacokinetic interaction between an antibacterial agent and a patient, with the pharmacodynamic interaction between the antibacterial agent and the bacterial pathogen. Integrating the pharmacokinetic parameter of area under the curve (AUC), with the pharmacodynamic measure of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) yields a ratio called the area under the inhibitory curve (AUIC). Clinical studies using dual individualisation to achieve a target AUIC24h of 125-250 have been performed with cephalosporins and fluoroquinalones. Economic evaluation of the results demonstrate that dual individualisation is cost-effective. Dual individualisation can be implemented in most practice setting using existing clinical data. Use of a computer model allows for cost-effective calculation of AUIC24h without having to measure serum drug concentrations of bacterial MIC. By adjusting antibacterial regimens to achieve a target AUIC, optimisation of antibacterial therapy can be achieved with resultant economic benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 10164056     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199610060-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  32 in total

1.  Economic aspects of pharmacokinetic services.

Authors:  C J Destache
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Mathematical examination of dual individualization principles (I): Relationships between AUC above MIC and area under the inhibitory curve for cefmenoxime, ciprofloxacin, and tobramycin.

Authors:  J J Schentag; D E Nix; M H Adelman
Journal:  DICP       Date:  1991-10

Review 3.  Health and economic impacts of antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  S D Holmberg; S L Solomon; P A Blake
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1987 Nov-Dec

4.  Twenty-four-hour area under the concentration-time curve/MIC ratio as a generic predictor of fluoroquinolone antimicrobial effect by using three strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and an in vitro pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  K J Madaras-Kelly; B E Ostergaard; L B Hovde; J C Rotschafer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Comparison of gentamicin and tobramycin nephrotoxicity in patients receiving individualized-pharmacokinetic dosing regimens.

Authors:  S Pancorbo; C Compty; J Heissler
Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos       Date:  1982 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.627

6.  Increased burn patient survival with individualized dosages of gentamicin.

Authors:  D E Zaske; J L Bootman; L B Solem; R G Strate
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Kinetics of antimicrobial activity.

Authors:  B Vogelman; W A Craig
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 8.  The importance of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic surrogate markers to outcome. Focus on antibacterial agents.

Authors:  J M Hyatt; P S McKinnon; G S Zimmer; J J Schentag
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Pharmacodynamics of intravenous ciprofloxacin in seriously ill patients.

Authors:  A Forrest; D E Nix; C H Ballow; T F Goss; M C Birmingham; J J Schentag
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Assessment of effects of protein binding on daptomycin and vancomycin killing of Staphylococcus aureus by using an in vitro pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  M W Garrison; K Vance-Bryan; T A Larson; J P Toscano; J C Rotschafer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Basis of anti-infective therapy: pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic criteria and methodology for dual dosage individualisation.

Authors:  A Sánchez-Navarro; M M Sánchez Recio
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Assessing antibacterial pharmacoeconomics in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  M C Birmingham; J M Hassett; J J Schentag; J A Paladino
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Selecting antibacterials for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy : pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic considerations.

Authors:  Richard S Slavik; Peter J Jewesson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.