| Literature DB >> 10146946 |
C A Gentry1, K A Rodvold, J S Bertino.
Abstract
Aminoglycoside agents are used for a wide variety of systemic infections and can profoundly affect hospital expenditures depending upon the amounts used, acquisition costs, and costs incurred during therapy. Significant cost advantages can be gained through selection and proper use of the appropriate aminoglycoside. Institutions can improve the selections by using inservice training and other educational methods, drug-use audits, and therapeutic substitution. Institutions may also restrict or delete certain aminoglycosides from the drug formularies to help minimise costs. Therapeutic drug monitoring can reduce the incidence of aminoglycoside adverse effects. However, some methods of monitoring, such as certain clinical pharmacokinetic services, can be time consuming and require additional manpower. These measures can be shown to be cost effective if they can decrease the length of therapy, minimise toxicity, decrease the length of hospitalisation, or affect mortality. Experimental data and preliminary clinical evidence suggest that once-daily regimens of aminoglycoside agents have some possible advantages over the standard regimens. If this regimen can be widely used, cost savings secondary to decreased use of aminoglycosides can be realised in the future. Potent, broad spectrum beta-lactam monotherapy has threatened to replace conventional combination therapies that include aminoglycosides in some infectious processes and a few studies have found certain single-drug therapies to be cost effective.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1993 PMID: 10146946 DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199303030-00006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmacoeconomics ISSN: 1170-7690 Impact factor: 4.981