Literature DB >> 7054839

Observations on the distensibility of the common bile duct.

P R Mueller, J T Ferrucci, J F Simeone, E vanSonnenberg, D A Hall, J Wittenberg.   

Abstract

This series describes 9 patients in whom a rapid change in bile duct caliber was documented by ultrasonography, intravenous or direct cholangiography, or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Two major observations were made: (a) the capacity of the common duct to distend and collapse over a short period, and (b) discordant measurements of bile duct diameter on successive examinations with different modalities (i.e., ultrasonography followed by cholangiography). It is thought that these discrepant measurements can be explained by the ability of the common duct to distend rapidly in response to pathologic and physiologic fluctuations in biliary pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7054839     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.142.2.7054839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  9 in total

Review 1.  The investigation of unexplained biliary dilatation.

Authors:  Alan Coss; Robert Enns
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2009-04

2.  Long-term follow-up of common bile duct diameter after endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Shadi Kolahdoozan; Rasoul Sotoudehmanesh; Morteza Khatibian; Ali Ali-Asgari; Shadi Shahraeeni; Fatemeh Zeinali
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-06

3.  Selective intraoperative cholangiography and single-stage management of common bile duct stone in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Shih-Chi Wu; Feng-Chi Chen; Chong-Jeh Lo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  The preoperatively normal bile duct does not dilate after cholecystectomy: results of a five year study.

Authors:  A W Majeed; B Ross; A G Johnson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Ultrasound detection of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with ERCP in the postcholecystectomy patient.

Authors:  H J O'Connor; I Hamilton; W R Ellis; J Watters; D J Lintott; A T Axon
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1986

6.  Biliary and pancreatic obstruction during gallstone migration.

Authors:  A Oría; B Frider; J Alvarez; L Chiappetta; N Souto; J J Fontana
Journal:  Int J Pancreatol       Date:  1988-03

7.  Behavior of the common bile duct diameter before and 12 years after choledochostomy for cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. A prospective study.

Authors:  Attila Csendes; Paula Csendes; Patricio Burdiles; Juan Carlos Diaz; Fernando Maluenda; Ana Maria Burgos
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Useful predictors of bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. McGill Gallstone Treatment Group.

Authors:  A N Barkun; J S Barkun; G M Fried; G Ghitulescu; O Steinmetz; C Pham; J L Meakins; C A Goresky
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Common bile duct stones associated with pancreatobiliary reflux and disproportionate bile duct dilatation.

Authors:  Cheal Wung Huh; Hee Wook Kim; Seung Woo Yi; Dong Ki Lee; Se Joon Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.889

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.