Literature DB >> 10517913

The preoperatively normal bile duct does not dilate after cholecystectomy: results of a five year study.

A W Majeed1, B Ross, A G Johnson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The common hepatic duct (CHD) is commonly believed to dilate after cholecystectomy but previous studies have either not measured CHD diameter preoperatively or the follow up period is short. AIMS: To measure CHD diameter before and after cholecystectomy.
METHODS: Patients undergoing (open) cholecystectomy and operative cholangiography had ultrasonographic measurement of CHD diameter before, and three and six months, and one and five years after cholecystectomy. The normal duct diameter was considered to be 5 mm or less, with an observer error of +/-1 mm.
RESULTS: Fifty nine patients with normal diameter ducts were studied. The majority (more than 95%) of patients did not have a dilatation of the CHD beyond 6 mm after cholecystectomy. The CHD appeared to increase as well as decrease with an overall trend towards a minor increase at five years. This was not statistically significant if the margin of error of 1 mm was taken into account.
CONCLUSION: A preoperatively normal CHD does not dilate after cholecystectomy and may require further investigation in symptomatic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10517913      PMCID: PMC1727736          DOI: 10.1136/gut.45.5.741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  15 in total

1.  Bile duct stones related to age and duct width.

Authors:  P EDHOLM; G JONSSON
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1962-07

2.  Biliary distensibility during per-operative cholangiography as compared to pre-operative ultrasound: a four year follow-up study.

Authors:  B Morgan; A Rathod; A Crozier; S Mullick
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  Respiratory variation of extrahepatic bile duct diameter during ultrasonography.

Authors:  R H Wachsberg
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Comparison of the extrahepatic bile duct size measured by ultrasound and by different radiographic methods.

Authors:  C Niederau; A Sonnenberg; J Mueller
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Observations on the distensibility of the common bile duct.

Authors:  P R Mueller; J T Ferrucci; J F Simeone; E vanSonnenberg; D A Hall; J Wittenberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Ultrasound evaluation of common bile duct size in normal adult patients and following cholecystectomy. A report of 750 cases.

Authors:  J N Bruneton; P Roux; D Fenart; E Caramella; J P Occelli
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  The discrepancy between radiographic and sonographic bile-duct measurements.

Authors:  E E Sauerbrei; P L Cooperberg; P Gordon; D Li; M M Cohen; H J Burhenne
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Ultrasound evaluation of common bile duct size.

Authors:  S G Parulekar
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Is there a significant increase in bile duct width after cholecystectomy?

Authors:  L E Hammarström; T Holmin
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  The common bile duct in man: its diameter and circumference.

Authors:  G H Mahour; K G Wakim; D O Ferris
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  5 in total

1.  Does cholecystectomy status influence the common bile duct diameter? A matched-pair analysis.

Authors:  Saurabh Chawla; William E Trick; Susan Gilkey; Bashar M Attar
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Common bile duct dilatation after cholecystectomy: a one-year prospective study.

Authors:  Seon Mee Park; Woo Seok Kim; Il-Hun Bae; Ji Hoon Kim; Dong Hee Ryu; Lee-Chan Jang; Jae-Woon Choi
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2012-07-25

3.  Behavior of the common bile duct diameter before and 12 years after choledochostomy for cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. A prospective study.

Authors:  Attila Csendes; Paula Csendes; Patricio Burdiles; Juan Carlos Diaz; Fernando Maluenda; Ana Maria Burgos
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and pancreatitis.

Authors:  M T McLoughlin; R M S Mitchell
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  In Silico Analysis Identifies Intestinal Transit as a Key Determinant of Systemic Bile Acid Metabolism.

Authors:  Fianne L P Sips; Hannah M Eggink; Peter A J Hilbers; Maarten R Soeters; Albert K Groen; Natal A W van Riel
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.566

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.