Literature DB >> 3514357

Ultrasound detection of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with ERCP in the postcholecystectomy patient.

H J O'Connor, I Hamilton, W R Ellis, J Watters, D J Lintott, A T Axon.   

Abstract

The role of ultrasound as a screening test for choledocholithiasis was prospectively assessed by comparing the results of upper abdominal ultrasound with direct cholangiography in 59 unselected symptomatic postcholecystectomy patients. Ultrasound detected duct stones in 13 of 29 patients (sensitivity, 45%) and their absence in 29 of 30 (specificity, 97%). A positive ultrasound diagnosis of choledocholithiasis was correct 13 times out of 14 (predictive value, 93%) whereas a negative diagnosis was correct on only 29 of 45 occasions (predictive value, 64%). No significant learning effect was seen. Intestinal gas obscuring the distal common duct was the most important factor limiting the ability of ultrasound to detect duct stones. Duct stones were present in 25 of 35 patients shown to have a dilated common duct on ultrasound, and in 4 of 24 with nondilated ducts; the predictive value of duct dilatation at ultrasound for duct stones was therefore 71% and that of nondilatation in excluding stones was 83%. Dilated intrahepatic bile ducts were demonstrated at ultrasound in only 17% of patients with choledocholithiasis. We conclude that ultrasound cannot reliably diagnose or exclude bile duct stones and is an inadequate screening test for the symptomatic postcholecystectomy patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3514357     DOI: 10.1007/bf02035060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2356


  24 in total

1.  Ultrasonic pseudocalculus effect in psotcholecystectomy patients.

Authors:  V D Raptopoulos
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Observations on the distensibility of the common bile duct.

Authors:  P R Mueller; J T Ferrucci; J F Simeone; E vanSonnenberg; D A Hall; J Wittenberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Dynamic changes in the caliber of the major bile ducts, related to obstruction.

Authors:  G A Scheske; P L Cooperberg; M M Cohen; H J Burhenne
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The size of the normal common hepatic duct following cholecystectomy: an ultrasonographic study.

Authors:  M F Graham; P L Cooperberg; M M Cohen; H J Burhenne
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Ultrasonographic screening of the common hepatic duct in symptomatic patients after cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M F Graham; P L Cooperberg; M M Cohen; H J Burhenne
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Jaundice, choledocholithiasis, and a nondilated common duct.

Authors:  R A Greenwald; R Pereiras; S J Morris; E R Schiff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1978-10-27       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Biliary tract dilatation in the nonjaundiced patient.

Authors:  B J Weinstein; D P Weinstein
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Prospective diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  J J Cronan; P R Mueller; J F Simeone; R S O'Connell; E vanSonnenberg; J Wittenberg; J T Ferrucci
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Endoscopic treatment of biliary-tract diseases. An international study.

Authors:  L Safrany
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-11-04       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Diagnosis of obstructive jaundice with nondilated bile ducts.

Authors:  C A Muhletaler; A J Gerlock; A C Fleischer; A E James
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  8 in total

1.  A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited.

Authors:  Chris Collins; Donal Maguire; Adrian Ireland; Edward Fitzgerald; Gerald C O'Sullivan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Combination of CT findings can reliably predict radiolucent common bile duct stones: a novel approach using a CT-based nomogram.

Authors:  Ji Hye Min; Kyung Sook Shin; Jeong Eun Lee; Seo-Youn Choi; Soohyun Ahn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  A diagnosis reconsidered: the symptomatic gallbladder remnant.

Authors:  Julie G Grossman; William R Johnston; Kathryn J Fowler; Gregory A Williams; Chet W Hammill; William G Hawkins
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 7.027

4.  Prospective evaluation of a selective approach to cholangiography for suspected common bile duct stones.

Authors:  James Horwood; Fayaz Akbar; Katherine Davis; Richard Morgan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 5.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus intraoperative cholangiography for diagnosis of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Vanja Giljaca; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

Review 6.  Ultrasound versus liver function tests for diagnosis of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Vanja Giljaca; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

7.  Accuracy of abdominal ultrasonography and the role of a second investigation in surgical obstructive jaundice.

Authors:  M Dwivedi; S K Acharya; S Nundy; B N Tandon
Journal:  Gastroenterol Jpn       Date:  1989-10

8.  Imaging beyond ultrasonically-impenetrable objects.

Authors:  Tali Ilovitsh; Asaf Ilovitsh; Josquin Foiret; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.