Literature DB >> 17682828

Behavior of the common bile duct diameter before and 12 years after choledochostomy for cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. A prospective study.

Attila Csendes1, Paula Csendes, Patricio Burdiles, Juan Carlos Diaz, Fernando Maluenda, Ana Maria Burgos.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In patients with common bile duct (CBD) stones, the diameter of the CBD is usually dilated. After surgery, the behavior of CBD diameter is not clearly known.
OBJECTIVE: To determine at a late follow-up the width of CBD before and after choledochostomy for CBD stones.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 39 patients with gallstones and CBD stones were included. They were 30 women and 9 men with a mean age of 52.6 years. In all ultrasound, determination of the CBD caliber before and 12 years after surgery was performed.
RESULTS: The mean value of the inner diameter of the CBD before surgery was 11.6 and 12.3 mm in patients below or above 60 years, respectively. Measurement 12 years after surgery showed a mean decrease of nearly 50% of preoperative values, which was highly significant (p < 0.0001). However, either below or above 60 years, only 75% of the patients showed this decrease, whereas 25% remained unchanged.
CONCLUSION: The dilated preoperative CBD returns to normal or near normal values in 3/4 of the patients after surgical exploration of the CBD and extraction of the stones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17682828     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-006-0078-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  15 in total

1.  Common bile duct measurements in an elderly population.

Authors:  R S Perret; G D Sloop; J A Borne
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  The common bile duct after cholecystectomy.

Authors:  L P LE QUESNE; C G WHITESIDE; B H HAND
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1959-02-07

3.  Does the common bile duct dilate after cholecystectomy? Sonographic evaluation in 234 patients.

Authors:  B Feng; Q Song
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Effect of cholecystectomy on common bile duct diameters: a longitudinal prospective ultrasonographic study.

Authors:  B Wedmann; G Börsch; C Coenen; A Paassen
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1988 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.910

5.  Observations on the distensibility of the common bile duct.

Authors:  P R Mueller; J T Ferrucci; J F Simeone; E vanSonnenberg; D A Hall; J Wittenberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Is there a significant increase in bile duct width after cholecystectomy?

Authors:  L E Hammarström; T Holmin
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Size of the common bile duct following cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M F Longo; J R Hodgson; D O Ferris
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  The preoperatively normal bile duct does not dilate after cholecystectomy: results of a five year study.

Authors:  A W Majeed; B Ross; A G Johnson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Prevalence of common bile duct stones according to the increasing number of risk factors present. A prospective study employing routinely intraoperative cholangiography in 477 cases.

Authors:  A Csendes; P Burdiles; J C Diaz; F Maluenda; O Korn; E Vallejo; P Csendes
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct

10.  Simultaneous bacteriologic assessment of bile from gallbladder and common bile duct in control subjects and patients with gallstones and common duct stones.

Authors:  A Csendes; P Burdiles; F Maluenda; J C Diaz; P Csendes; N Mitru
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1996-04
View more
  2 in total

1.  Open common bile duct exploration without T-tube insertion- two decade experience from a limited resource setting in the Caribbean.

Authors:  Vijay Naraynsingh; Seetharaman Hariharan; Michael J Ramdass; Dilip Dan; Parul Shukla; Ravi Maharaj
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  Common bile duct stones associated with pancreatobiliary reflux and disproportionate bile duct dilatation.

Authors:  Cheal Wung Huh; Hee Wook Kim; Seung Woo Yi; Dong Ki Lee; Se Joon Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.889

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.