Literature DB >> 7034643

Comparative evaluation of three methods for measuring gentamicin and tobramycin in serum.

J H Ngui-Yen, T Hofmann, M Wigmore, J A Smith.   

Abstract

Three procedures (radioimmunoassay, fluorescence immunoassay, and enzyme immunoassay) for the determination of gentamicin and tobramycin levels were compared. These systems were evaluated on the basis of accuracy, reproducibility, specificity, and cost. All three systems showed a high degree of accuracy and precision. The fluorescence immunoassay gave significantly lower values for gentamicin and tobramycin at levels below 5 microgram/ml. Of the three systems, the radioimmunoassay was the least expensive, provided that a minimum of 10 analyses were performed daily; single tests required more technical time and were more costly. Costs of single tests by fluorescence immunoassay and enzyme immunoassay systems were similar. The enzyme immunoassay system performed equally well for both gentamicin and tobramycin in giving rapid and accurate results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7034643      PMCID: PMC181805          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.20.6.821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of enzymatic and microbiological gentamicin assays.

Authors:  A L Smith; J A Waitz; D H Smith; E M Oden; B B Emerson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Homogeneous reactant-labeled fluorescent immunoassay for therapeutic drugs exemplified by gentamicin determination in human serum.

Authors:  J F Burd; R C Wong; J E Feeney; R J Carrico; R C Boguslaski
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Rapid, reproducible enzyme immunoassay for gentamicin.

Authors:  D Phaneuf; E Francke; H C Neu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Rapid microassay of gentamicin, kanamycin, neomycin, streptomycin, and vancomycin in serum or plasma.

Authors:  L D Sabath; J I Casey; P A Ruch; L L Stumpf; M Finland
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  1971-09

5.  Evaluation of serum gentamicin assay procedures for a clinical microbiology laboratory.

Authors:  C H Lantz; D J Lawrie; F G Witebsky; J D MacLowry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Radioimmunoassay for measurement of gentamicin in blood.

Authors:  W A Mahon; J Ezer; T W Wilson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 5.191

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of four gentamicin and tobramycin assay procedures for clinical laboratories.

Authors:  F G Witebsky; C A Sliva; S T Selepak; M E Ruddel; J D MacLowry; E E Johnson; R J Elin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Measurement of levels of aminoglycosides and vancomycin in serum in the presence of new beta-lactam antibiotics.

Authors:  S B Calderwood; C C Tung; E Jackson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique with fluorescence polarization immunoassay for determination of gentamicin and tobramycin levels in serum.

Authors:  D J Pohlod; L D Saravolatz; M M Somerville
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparative analysis of two rapid, automated methods for determining aminoglycoside levels.

Authors:  J H Ngui-Yen; P W Doyle; J A Smith
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Prospective randomized trial of piperacillin monotherapy versus carboxypenicillin-aminoglycoside combination regimens in the empirical treatment of serious bacterial infections.

Authors:  M J Gribble; A W Chow; S C Naiman; J A Smith; W R Bowie; S L Sacks; L Grossman; N Buskard; G H Growe; L H Plenderleith
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.191

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.