Literature DB >> 20851756

A bird brain's view of auditory processing and perception.

Katherine Nagel1, Gunsoo Kim, Helen McLendon, Allison Doupe.   

Abstract

By studying the primary forebrain auditory area of songbirds, field L, using a song-inspired synthetic stimulus and reverse correlation techniques, we found a surprisingly systematic organization of this area, with nearly all neurons narrowly tuned along the spectral dimension, the temporal dimension, or both; there were virtually no strongly orientation-sensitive cells, and in the areas that we recorded, cells broadly tuned in both time and frequency were rare. In addition, cells responsive to fast temporal frequencies predominated only in the field L input layer, suggesting that neurons with fast and slow responses are concentrated in different regions. Together with other songbird data and work from chicks and mammals, these findings suggest that sampling a range of temporal and spectral modulations, rather than orientation in time-frequency space, is the organizing principle of forebrain auditory sensitivity. We then examined the role of these acoustic parameters important to field L organization in a behavioral task. Birds' categorization of songs fell off rapidly when songs were altered in frequency, but, despite the temporal sensitivity of field L neurons, the same birds generalized well to songs that were significantly changed in timing. These behavioral data point out that we cannot assume that animals use the information present in particular neurons without specifically testing perception.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20851756      PMCID: PMC3065528          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  76 in total

1.  Different subthreshold mechanisms underlie song selectivity in identified HVc neurons of the zebra finch.

Authors:  R Mooney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Processing of frequency-modulated stimuli in the chick auditory cortex analogue: evidence for topographic representations and possible mechanisms of rate and directional sensitivity.

Authors:  P Heil; G Langner; H Scheich
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Sound processing in the auditory-cortex homologue of songbirds: functional organization and developmental issues.

Authors:  I George; H Cousillas; B Vernier; J P Richard; L Henry; M Mathelier; T Lengagne; M Hausberger
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2005-11-15

4.  Tuning for spectro-temporal modulations as a mechanism for auditory discrimination of natural sounds.

Authors:  Sarah M N Woolley; Thane E Fremouw; Anne Hsu; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-04       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Mate recognition by female zebra finch: analysis of individuality in male call and first investigations on female decoding process.

Authors:  Clémentine Vignal; Nicolas Mathevon; Stéphane Mottin
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Hierarchical computation in the canonical auditory cortical circuit.

Authors:  Craig A Atencio; Tatyana O Sharpee; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Acoustic parameters underlying the responses of song-specific neurons in the white-crowned sparrow.

Authors:  D Margoliash
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Feature analysis of natural sounds in the songbird auditory forebrain.

Authors:  K Sen; F E Theunissen; A J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Perceptual mechanisms for individual vocal recognition in European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Cytoarchitectonic organization and morphology of cells of the field L complex in male zebra finches (Taenopygia guttata).

Authors:  E S Fortune; D Margoliash
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 3.215

View more
  1 in total

1.  Auditory feedback modulates development of kitten vocalizations.

Authors:  Peter Hubka; Wiebke Konerding; Andrej Kral
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 5.249

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.