Literature DB >> 7013798

Dihydrofolate reductase hysteresis and its effect of inhibitor binding analyses.

D P Baccanari, S S Joyner.   

Abstract

Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase was shown to follow slow transient kinetics (hysteresis). Nonlinear reaction velocities were detected during the enzyme assay and required 10-15 min to reach a steady-state rate. The degree of hysteresis was influenced by the enzyme concentration and the order of substrate addition. Incubation of the enzyme with NADPH before addition of dihydrofolate resulted in slow initial velocities that increased up to 2-fold during the course of the assay. Increasing the enzyme concentration from 0.2 to 1 nM resulted in diminished hysteresis. NADPH-initiated reactions were linear at all enzyme concentrations tested. Certain drugs had profound effects on hysteresis. Pyrimethamine practically eliminated the hysteresis of dihydrofolate-started reactions, whereas trimethoprime augmented the non-linearities in the sense that hysteresis was detected in both enzyme- and NADPH-started reactions. The shape of these reaction tracings makes trimethoprim is not a slow-binding inhibitor when assayed under conditions that eliminate hysteresis. Contrary to this, sulfamethoxazole did not affect hysteresis or augment inhibition of the enzyme by trimethoprim. Sulfamethoxazole alone (at 6 mM) did not inhibit the hysteresis and allow reliable determinations of Ki values of both weak and tight binding inhibitors. For example, Ki values for pyrimethamine, trimethoprim, and methotrexate were found to be 214 nM, 1.3 nM, and 0.021 nM, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7013798     DOI: 10.1021/bi00510a002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  15 in total

1.  Multidrug efflux in intrinsic resistance to trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  T Köhler; M Kok; M Michea-Hamzehpour; P Plesiat; N Gotoh; T Nishino; L K Curty; J C Pechere
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Purification and characterization of dihydrofolate reductase from Mycobacterium phlei.

Authors:  M Al-Rubeai; J W Dale
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1986-04-01       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  Large cosolutes, small cosolutes, and dihydrofolate reductase activity.

Authors:  Luis C Acosta; Gerardo M Perez Goncalves; Gary J Pielak; Annelise H Gorensek-Benitez
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Cloning and characterization of dihydrofolate reductase from a facultative alkaliphilic and halotolerant bacillus strain.

Authors:  Lars Redecke; Maria A Brehm; Reinhard Bredehorst
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Multiple mutations modulate the function of dihydrofolate reductase in trimethoprim-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  J P Maskell; A M Sefton; L M Hall
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Characterization of the gene for chromosomal trimethoprim-sensitive dihydrofolate reductase of Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923.

Authors:  G E Dale; R L Then; D Stüber
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Alpha-pyridine nucleotides as substrates for a plasmid-specified dihydrofolate reductase.

Authors:  S L Smith; J J Burchall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Characterization of the gene for the chromosomal dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) of Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 14990: the origin of the trimethoprim-resistant S1 DHFR from Staphylococcus aureus?

Authors:  G E Dale; C Broger; P G Hartman; H Langen; M G Page; R L Then; D Stüber
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Cloning and characterization of a novel, plasmid-encoded trimethoprim-resistant dihydrofolate reductase from Staphylococcus haemolyticus MUR313.

Authors:  G E Dale; H Langen; M G Page; R L Then; D Stüber
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Amplification of protein expression in a cell free system.

Authors:  E Resto; A Iida; M D Van Cleve; S M Hecht
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-11-25       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.