Literature DB >> 7000770

DNA binding characteristics of lactose repressor and the trypsin-resistant core repressor.

R B O'Gorman, M Dunaway, K S Matthews.   

Abstract

The nonspecific DNA binding capacity of repressor protein has been assessed by boundary sedimentation of repressor and calf thymus DNA fragmented by shearing and by nitrocellulose ultrafiltration employing labeled lambdaplac DNA in the presence of inducer concentrations sufficient to insure dissociation of repressor from the operator region of the DNA. These methods gave values in good agreement with values previously reported in the literature. The association constants for the interaction of repressor with operator DNA fragments and lambdaplac DNA have been measured and found to differ by approximately 100-fold at low salt concentrations, but the difference decreases to 4-fold at salt concentrations near the physiological value. The equilibrium association constant for the repressor-operator DNA fragment is significantly less sensitive to salt concentration than the corresponding constant for lambdaplac DNA. Inducer decreases the salt concentration dependence of repressor-operator DNA fragment only slightly. Measurement of the association constants for the interaction of the trypsin-resistant core protein with operator DNA fragment and lambdaplac DNA indicate that the core protein binds to the two DNA's with the same affinity. This result contrasts with the differential affinity of intact repressor for these two DNA's. In addition, the core protein association constants for operator DNA fragment and lambdaplac DNA display minimal dependence on the salt concentration. These results suggest a role for nonionic interactions in the binding of core protein to operator DNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7000770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  21 in total

1.  Fluorescence resonance energy transfer over approximately 130 basepairs in hyperstable lac repressor-DNA loops.

Authors:  Laurence M Edelman; Raymond Cheong; Jason D Kahn
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  DNA looping.

Authors:  K S Matthews
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1992-03

3.  Extrinsic interactions dominate helical propensity in coupled binding and folding of the lactose repressor protein hinge helix.

Authors:  Hongli Zhan; Liskin Swint-Kruse; Kathleen Shive Matthews
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Lac repressor-Lac operator complexes. Solution X-ray scattering and electrophoretic studies.

Authors:  F Culard; M Charlier; J C Maurizot; A Tardieu
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.733

5.  The strengths and limitations of using biolayer interferometry to monitor equilibrium titrations of biomolecules.

Authors:  Chamitha J Weeramange; Max S Fairlamb; Dipika Singh; Aron W Fenton; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Lac repressor - lac operator interaction. Circular dichroism study.

Authors:  F Culard; J C Maurizot
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1981-10-10       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Demonstration of two operator elements in gal: in vitro repressor binding studies.

Authors:  A Majumdar; S Adhya
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Sequence of galR gene indicates a common evolutionary origin of lac and gal repressor in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  B von Wilcken-Bergmann; B Müller-Hill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Model for lactose repressor protein and its interaction with ligands.

Authors:  M Dunaway; S P Manly; K S Matthews
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Resolution of the fluorescence decay of the two tryptophan residues of lac repressor using single tryptophan mutants.

Authors:  C A Royer; J A Gardner; J M Beechem; J C Brochon; K S Matthews
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.