Literature DB >> 6385008

Demonstration of two operator elements in gal: in vitro repressor binding studies.

A Majumdar, S Adhya.   

Abstract

Genetic and DNA base sequence analyses of cis-dominant mutations that derepress the gal operon of Escherichia coli suggested the existence of two operator loci needed for gal repression. One (OE) is located immediately upstream to the two overlapping gal promoters and the other (OI) is inside the first structural gene. We have investigated the ability of wild-type and mutant OE and OI DNA sequences to bind to gal repressor. The repressor has been purified from cells containing a multicopy plasmid in which the repressor gene is brought under the control of phage lambda PL promoter. The DNA-repressor interactions are detected by the change in electrophoretic mobility of labeled DNA that accompanies its complex formation with repressor protein. The purified repressor shows concentration-dependent binding to both O+E and O+I but not to OEc and OIc sequences. These results authenticate the proposed operator role of the two homologous gal DNA control elements and thereby establish that the negative control of the gal operon requires repressor binding at both OE and OI, which are separated by greater than 90 base pairs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6385008      PMCID: PMC391867          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.81.19.6100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  23 in total

1.  Unusual location and function of the operator in the Escherichia coli galactose operon.

Authors:  R DiLauro; T Taniguchi; R Musso; B de Crombrugghe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1979-06-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Modulation of the two promoters of the galactose operon of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  S Adhya; W Miller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1979-06-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Dual control for transcription of the galactose operon by cyclic AMP and its receptor protein at two interspersed promoters.

Authors:  R E Musso; R Di Lauro; S Adhya; B de Crombrugghe
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  In vitro repression of the transcription of gas operon by purified gal repressor.

Authors:  S Nakanishi; S Adhya; M E Gottesman; I Pastan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Mutations in the galactose-operator.

Authors:  L Fiethen; P Starlinger
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1970

6.  Negative control of the galactose operon in E. coli.

Authors:  H Saedler; A Gullon; L Fiethen; P Starlinger
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1968

7.  RNA polymerase nascent product analysis.

Authors:  M Takanami
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.600

8.  Isolation of the gal repressor.

Authors:  J S Parks; M Gottesman; K Shimada; R A Weisberg; R L Perlman; I Pastan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Interaction site of Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein on DNA of galactose operon promoters.

Authors:  T Taniguchi; M O'Neill; B de Crombrugghe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Glucose effect and the galactose enzymes of Escherichia coli: correlation between glucose inhibition of induction and inducer transport.

Authors:  S Adhya; H Echols
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  50 in total

1.  GalR mutants defective in repressosome formation.

Authors:  M Geanacopoulos; G Vasmatzis; D E Lewis; S Roy; B Lee; S Adhya
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Operator-bound GalR dimers close DNA loops by direct interaction: tetramerization and inducer binding.

Authors:  Szabolcs Semsey; Mark Geanacopoulos; Dale E A Lewis; Sankar Adhya
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Control of gal transcription through DNA looping: inhibition of the initial transcribing complex.

Authors:  H E Choy; S Adhya
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Domains of the rat rDNA promoter must be aligned stereospecifically.

Authors:  W Q Xie; L I Rothblum
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Further inducibility of a constitutive system: ultrainduction of the gal operon.

Authors:  J P Tokeson; S Garges; S Adhya
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  DNA looping and Sp1 multimer links: a mechanism for transcriptional synergism and enhancement.

Authors:  I A Mastrangelo; A J Courey; J S Wall; S P Jackson; P V Hough
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  DNA looping.

Authors:  K S Matthews
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1992-03

8.  Spiral structure of Escherichia coli HUalphabeta provides foundation for DNA supercoiling.

Authors:  Fusheng Guo; Sankar Adhya
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Stereospecific alignment of the X and Y elements is required for major histocompatibility complex class II DRA promoter function.

Authors:  B J Vilen; J P Cogswell; J P Ting
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Identification of multiple repressor recognition sites in the hut system of Pseudomonas putida.

Authors:  L Hu; S L Allison; A T Phillips
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.