Literature DB >> 6950749

Acoustic cavitation: a possible consequence of biomedical uses of ultrasound.

R E Apfel.   

Abstract

Those concerned with acoustic cavitation often use different measures and nomenclature to those who employ ultrasound for medical purposes. After illustrating the connections between the two, acoustic cavitation phenomena are divided into two classes: (1) relatively moderate amplitude changes in the bubble size that occur during each acoustic cycle, as with rectified diffusion and resonant bubble motion, and (2) rather dramatic changes in the bubble radius that occur in one cycle. It is seen that pulse-echo diagnostic equipment can excite the dramatic changes whereas continuous wave therapeutic equipment will excite the slower, but no less important, changes. The ranges of the acoustic variables and material states for which these phenomena are possible are quantified. It is shown that whereas the concept of an ultrasonic (energy) dose may be appropriate for the effects of acoustically induced heating or resonant bubble motion. It is inappropriate when discussing the effects of the transient type of cavitation that can occur from short, high amplitude acoustic pulses.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6950749      PMCID: PMC2149304     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer Suppl        ISSN: 0306-9443


  4 in total

1.  Ultrasonically induced cavitation in vivo.

Authors:  G ter Haar; S Daniels; K C Eastaugh; C R Hill
Journal:  Br J Cancer Suppl       Date:  1982-03

2.  Ultrasonic microstreaming and related phenomena.

Authors:  W L Nyborg
Journal:  Br J Cancer Suppl       Date:  1982-03

3.  Acoustic pressure amplitude thresholds for rectified diffusion in gaseous microbubbles in biological tissue.

Authors:  P A Lewin; L Bjørnø
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Ultrasonic power and intensities produced by diagnostic ultrasound equipment.

Authors:  P L Carson; P R Fischella; T V Oughton
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 2.998

  4 in total
  36 in total

Review 1.  Section 8--clinical relevance. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 2.  Section 6--mechanical bioeffects in the presence of gas-carrier ultrasound contrast agents. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 3.  Section 7--discussion of the mechanical index and other exposure parameters. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 4.  Section 4--bioeffects in tissues with gas bodies. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Different effects of sonoporation on cell morphology and viability.

Authors:  Ji-Zhen Zhang; Jasdeep K Saggar; Zhao-Li Zhou; Bing Hu
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.363

Review 6.  Ultrasound-biophysics mechanisms.

Authors:  William D O'Brien
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 7.  Ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis for stroke therapy: better thrombus break-up with bubbles.

Authors:  Kathryn E Hitchcock; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Over-pressure suppresses ultrasonic-induced drug uptake.

Authors:  S Briant Stringham; Maria A Viskovska; Eric S Richardson; Seiga Ohmine; Ghaleb A Husseini; Byron K Murray; William G Pitt
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 9.  Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound: a new technology for clinical neurosciences.

Authors:  Ferenc A Jolesz; Nathan J McDannold
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 10.  Ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier disruption for targeted drug delivery in the central nervous system.

Authors:  Muna Aryal; Costas D Arvanitis; Phillip M Alexander; Nathan McDannold
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 15.470

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.