Literature DB >> 6884174

Suprathreshold contrast perception in functional amblyopia.

D S Loshin, D M Levi.   

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted to investigate suprathreshold contrast perception of a group of strabismic and anisometropic amblyopes. In the first experiment, simple reaction-time was measured as a function of the contrast of sinusoidal gratings. At all contrast levels, the amblyopic eyes showed prolonged reaction-times compared to the non-amblyopic eyes. In the second experiment, the perceived contrast of suprathreshold sinusoidal gratings was measured using an interocular successive matching paradigm. The third experiment compared perceived contrast of the amblyopic and non-amblyopic eye by contrast magnitude estimation. The results of the matching and magnitude estimation experiments showed that while amblyopic observers show large losses of contrast sensitivity at threshold, at suprathreshold contrast levels perceived contrast is essentially normal or near normal in the amblyopic eye. Taken together, these experiments suggest that: 1) the amblyopic eye has a higher contrast gain than the non-amblyopic eye, and 2) the amblyopic eye shows prolonged response latencies. Similar results can be obtained in normal observers under conditions of peripheral viewing and noise masking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6884174     DOI: 10.1007/bf00140810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  29 in total

Review 1.  The visual deprivation syndrome.

Authors:  M L Crawford
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 2.  Visually evoked responses in amblyopia.

Authors:  G B Arden; W M Barnard; A S Mushin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Reversal of the physiological effects of monocular deprivation in kittens: further evidence for a sensitive period.

Authors:  C Blakemore; R C Van Sluyters
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Rapid assessment of visual function: an electronic sweep technique for the pattern visual evoked potential.

Authors:  C W Tyler; P Apkarian; D M Levi; K Nakayama
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  A case of amblyopia; electrophysiology and psychophysics of luminance and contrast.

Authors:  H Spekreijse; L H Khoe; L H van der Tweel
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  Normal and amblyopic contrast sensitivity function in central and peripheral retinas.

Authors:  J Thomas
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Experimental strabismus in the kitten.

Authors:  R C Van Sluyters; F B Levitt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Amblyopic eyes have longer reaction times.

Authors:  D I Hamasaki; J T Flynn
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  A power law for perceived contrast in human vision.

Authors:  J Gottesman; G S Rubin; G E Legge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Contrast sensitivity in anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  A Bradley; R D Freeman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  15 in total

1.  Using visual noise to characterize amblyopic letter identification.

Authors:  Denis G Pelli; Dennis M Levi; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-10-29       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 2.  Linking assumptions in amblyopia.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.241

3.  Binocular combination in abnormal binocular vision.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Stanley A Klein; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Rebalancing binocular vision in amblyopia.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Central and peripheral contrast sensitivity in amblyopia with varying field size.

Authors:  L M Katz; D M Levi; H E Bedell
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-12-15       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  A double dissociation of the acuity and crowding limits to letter identification, and the promise of improved visual screening.

Authors:  Shuang Song; Dennis M Levi; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Deficient binocular combination reveals mechanisms of anisometropic amblyopia: signal attenuation and interocular inhibition.

Authors:  Chang-Bing Huang; Jiawei Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu; Yifeng Zhou
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Binocular combination in anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  Chang-Bing Huang; Jiawei Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu; Lixia Feng; Yifeng Zhou
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Learning to identify near-threshold luminance-defined and contrast-defined letters in observers with amblyopia.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Roger W Li; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Binocular visual deficits at mid to high spatial frequency in treated amblyopes.

Authors:  Shijia Chen; Seung Hyun Min; Ziyun Cheng; Yue Xiong; Xi Yu; Lili Wei; Yu Mao; Robert F Hess; Jiawei Zhou
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-06-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.