Literature DB >> 6871716

Interaction between the long-latency stretch reflex and voluntary electromyographic activity prior to a rapid voluntary motor reaction.

B L Day, J C Rothwell, C D Marsden.   

Abstract

The size of the long-latency component of the stretch reflex has been examined in the time interval between a signal to move and the required rapid voluntary contraction of triceps and flexor pollicis longus in 8 normal subjects. Bilateral movements of the elbow and thumb were made following an auditory signal. In 50% of the trials a torque pulse was applied unilaterally in order to elicit a stretch reflex response in one arm. The voluntary response in the contralateral arm was uncorrupted by a stretch reflex response, so was used as an indicator of voluntary reaction time. Control experiments, using an electrical stimulus to the fingers rather than muscle stretch, verified that both arms reacted almost simultaneously to the auditory cue, even when the reaction time was shortened by the presence of a unilateral electrical stimulus. Similarly, an interposed muscle stretch stimulus considerably reduced the reaction time to the audio signal. Because of this, the start of the voluntary EMG response frequently 'over-lapped' the end of the long-latency stretch reflex. Failure to take this shortening of voluntary reaction time into consideration can lead to the erroneous conclusion that reflex gain is increased prior to a rapid movement. If the 'overlap' of EMG responses is accounted for, very little change in the size of the long-latency stretch reflex is evident prior to activation of the muscles responsible for the movement of either the elbow or the thumb.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6871716     DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(83)90791-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  12 in total

1.  Interlimb differences in control of movement extent.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg; Sydney Y Schaefer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Proprioceptive reaction times and long-latency reflexes in humans.

Authors:  C D Manning; S A Tolhurst; P Bawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Differential influence of vision and proprioception on control of movement distance.

Authors:  Leia B Bagesteiro; Fabrice R Sarlegna; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Interlimb transfer of load compensation during rapid elbow joint movements.

Authors:  Leia B Bagesteiro; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Rapid motor responses quickly integrate visuospatial task constraints.

Authors:  Lu Yang; Jonathan A Michaels; J Andrew Pruszynski; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Programmed and triggered actions to rapid load changes during precision grip.

Authors:  R S Johansson; G Westling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Patterned ballistic movements triggered by a startle in healthy humans.

Authors:  J Valls-Solé; J C Rothwell; F Goulart; G Cossu; E Muñoz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Cerebral potentials and electromyographic responses evoked by stretch of wrist muscles in man.

Authors:  G Abbruzzese; A Berardelli; J C Rothwell; B L Day; C D Marsden
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Rapid goal-directed elbow flexion movements: limitations of the speed control system due to neural constraints.

Authors:  R Benecke; H M Meinck; B Conrad
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Effects of prior instruction and anaesthesia on long-latency responses to stretch in the long flexor of the human thumb.

Authors:  C K Loo; D I McCloskey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.