Literature DB >> 3416959

Programmed and triggered actions to rapid load changes during precision grip.

R S Johansson1, G Westling.   

Abstract

A test object (grip apparatus) was held at its upper part using a precision grip. Small balls were dropped into a target cup at the bottom of the apparatus. The grip force, the load force (vertical lifting force) and the vertical movement were measured. Electromyographic activity (e.m.g.) was recorded from four antagonist pairs of hand/arm muscles primarily influencing the grip force or the load force. The balls were dropped either by the subject during a bimanual task, or unexpectedly by the experimenter. When the subject dropped the ball, preparatory actions occurred before the rapid increase in the vertical load caused by the impact. These actions appeared ca. 150 ms prior to the impact and involved a grip force increase and a lifting movement of the grip apparatus. The e.m.g. activity increased in all eight of the hand and arm muscles, indicating a general stiffening of the hand/arm system prior to the impact. Furthermore, the preparatory actions were programmed adequately for the size of the load force step at the impact, i.e. an adequate safety margin to prevent slips was preserved during the critical period of the impact. Thus, variations in this step caused by changes in (i) the weight of ball, (ii) the weight of the grip apparatus and (iii) the length of the drop were adequately taken into account during the programming of these actions. In addition, the frictional condition between the skin and the grip surface was also taken into account. The relevant sensory information apparently was obtained during the handling of the ball and the grip apparatus prior to the drop. There were also task-related automatic muscle responses triggered by the impact. These responses, which also served to stiffen the hand/arm system, were most pronounced during unexpected load changes, but they appeared too late to prevent slips. However, if no overall slip occurred, the triggered responses were functional in the sense that they helped to quickly restore the safety margin and the vertical position of the object.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3416959     DOI: 10.1007/BF00247523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

1.  Phase dependent reflex reversal during walking in chronic spinal cats.

Authors:  H Forssberg; S Grillner; S Rossignol
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1975-02-21       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Regulatory actions of human stretch reflex.

Authors:  P E Crago; J C Houk; Z Hasan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Signals in tactile afferents from the fingers eliciting adaptive motor responses during precision grip.

Authors:  R S Johansson; G Westling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Long-latency automatic responses to muscle stretch in man: origin and function.

Authors:  C D Marsden; J C Rothwell; B L Day
Journal:  Adv Neurol       Date:  1983

5.  Human postural responses.

Authors:  C D Marsden; P A Merton; H B Morton
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Interaction between pre-activity and stretch reflex in human triceps brachii during landing from forward falls.

Authors:  V Dietz; J Noth; D Schmidtbleicher
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Automatic and "voluntary' responses compensating for disturbances of human thumb movements.

Authors:  J C Rothwell; M M Traub; C D Marsden
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-09-23       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Response to transient disturbances during intentional forearm flexion in man.

Authors:  J R Dufresne; V S Gurfinkel; J F Soechting; C A Terzuolo
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1978-07-07       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Observations on the control of stepping and hopping movements in man.

Authors:  G M Jones; D G Watt
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Servo action in the human thumb.

Authors:  C D Marsden; P A Merton; H B Morton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  113 in total

1.  Predictions specify reactive control of individual digits in manipulation.

Authors:  Yukari Ohki; Benoni B Edin; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Reactive control of precision grip does not depend on fast transcortical reflex pathways in X-linked Kallmann subjects.

Authors:  L M Harrison; M J Mayston; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Control of ball-racket interactions in rhythmic propulsion of elastic and non-elastic balls.

Authors:  Hiromu Katsumata; Vladimir Zatsiorsky; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-01-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Consensus paper: roles of the cerebellum in motor control--the diversity of ideas on cerebellar involvement in movement.

Authors:  Mario Manto; James M Bower; Adriana Bastos Conforto; José M Delgado-García; Suzete Nascimento Farias da Guarda; Marcus Gerwig; Christophe Habas; Nobuhiro Hagura; Richard B Ivry; Peter Mariën; Marco Molinari; Eiichi Naito; Dennis A Nowak; Nordeyn Oulad Ben Taib; Denis Pelisson; Claudia D Tesche; Caroline Tilikete; Dagmar Timmann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Predictability influences finger force control when catching a free-falling object.

Authors:  Dennis A Nowak; Joachim Hermsdörfer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Loads applied tangential to a fingertip during an object restraint task can trigger short-latency as well as long-latency EMG responses in hand muscles.

Authors:  Vaughan G Macefield; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Moving objects in a rotating environment: rapid prediction of Coriolis and centrifugal force perturbations.

Authors:  Dennis A Nowak; Joachim Hermsdörfer; Erich Schneider; Stefan Glasauer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-03       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  How dependent are grip force and arm actions during holding an object?

Authors:  F Danion
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Feedforward postural stabilization in a distal bimanual unloading task.

Authors:  P Kaluzny; M Wiesendanger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Grip responses to object load perturbations are stimulus and phase sensitive.

Authors:  L A Mrotek; B A Hart; P K Schot; L Fennigkoh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.