Literature DB >> 6862451

Compatibility and resource competition between modalities of input, central processing, and output.

C D Wickens, D L Sandry, M Vidulich.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6862451     DOI: 10.1177/001872088302500209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


× No keyword cloud information.
  16 in total

1.  What causes residual dual-task interference after practice?

Authors:  Eric Ruthruff; Eliot Hazeltine; Roger W Remington
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-09-24

2.  Modality pairing effects and the response selection bottleneck.

Authors:  Eliot Hazeltine; Eric Ruthruff
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-09-06

3.  Searching working memory for the source of dual-task costs.

Authors:  Eliot Hazeltine; Timothy Wifall
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-07-07

4.  Interference effects of stimulus-response modality pairings in dual tasks and their robustness.

Authors:  Christine Stelzel; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-08-03

5.  Crossmodal action: modality matters.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Eliot Hazeltine
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-11

6.  Stimulus-response compatibility with body parts: a study with hands.

Authors:  Allan Pablo Lameira; Antônio Pereira; Roberto Sena Fraga-Filho; Luiz G Gawryszewski
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The role of learning in sensory-motor modality switching.

Authors:  Simone Schaeffner; Iring Koch; Andrea M Philipp
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-05-24

Review 8.  Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention.

Authors:  N Lavie; Y Tsal
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-08

9.  Inducing closing-in phenomenon in healthy young adults: the effect of dual task and stimulus complexity on drawing performance.

Authors:  Laura Sagliano; Francesca D'Olimpio; Massimiliano Conson; Angela Cappuccio; Dario Grossi; Luigi Trojano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Do small dual-task costs reflect ideomotor compatibility or the absence of crosstalk?

Authors:  Kimberly M Halvorson; Eliot Hazeltine
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.