Literature DB >> 25893910

Stimulus-response compatibility with body parts: a study with hands.

Allan Pablo Lameira1, Antônio Pereira, Roberto Sena Fraga-Filho, Luiz G Gawryszewski.   

Abstract

Stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) effects are classified depending on the way that the elements of the stimulus and response sets interact, influencing both the speed and accuracy of the motor response. This is particularly important for social stimuli, such as hands. However, the stimuli used in most SRC studies are often simple or abstract figures. Our main goal in the present work was to investigate how task ensembles containing body parts (hands) as stimuli fit into Kornblum's taxonomy expressed in the dimensional overlap model. Specifically, we test whether hand stimuli elicit Simon or spatial Stroop effects in a SRC task. We set up two experiments using either hands or arrows as stimuli. Our results demonstrate that hands elicit a Simon effect in a SRC task. However, different from arrows, which constitute Type 8 Kornblum's ensembles, hands do not elicit a spatial Stroop effect and form Type 3 ensembles.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25893910     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4283-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  30 in total

1.  S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes.

Authors:  P M FITTS; C M SEEGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-09

2.  Brain networks involved in viewing angry hands or faces.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Grosbras; Tomás Paus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 3.  Dynamics of hemispheric specialization and integration in the context of motor control.

Authors:  Deborah J Serrien; Richard B Ivry; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Posture influences motor imagery: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Floris P de Lange; Rick C Helmich; Ivan Toni
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Implicit visual analysis in handedness recognition.

Authors:  M Gentilucci; E Daprati; M Gangitano
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  1998-09

6.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Location dominance in attending to color and shape.

Authors:  Y Tsal; N Lavie
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Congruency between Word Position and Meaning is Caused by Task-Induced Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Diane Pecher; Saskia Van Dantzig; Inge Boot; Kiki Zanolie; David E Huber
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-09-07

Review 9.  The neural basis of visual body perception.

Authors:  Marius V Peelen; Paul E Downing
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Independent processing of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response conflicts.

Authors:  Qi Li; Weizhi Nan; Kai Wang; Xun Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  How different location modes influence responses in a Simon-like task.

Authors:  Chunming Luo; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-09-27

2.  Visuomotor and motorvisual priming with different types of set-level congruency: evidence in support of ideomotor theory, and the planning and control model (PCM).

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke; R Christopher Miall; Miriam Rueß; Puja R Mehta; Brian Hopkins
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-07-29

3.  Does the body talk to the body? The relationship between different body representations while observing others' body parts.

Authors:  Alessia Tessari; Giovanni Ottoboni
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2022-02-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.