Literature DB >> 21735042

Searching working memory for the source of dual-task costs.

Eliot Hazeltine1, Timothy Wifall.   

Abstract

Dual-task costs depend on the specific pairings of stimulus and response modalities. Such findings are analogous to domain-specific effects in the working memory (WM) literature, in which items compete for limited capacity when they involve related types of information. The present study explicitly examines the relationship between modality-pairing effects on dual-task costs and domain-specificity effects on WM capacity. Participants maintained a sequence of either locations or tones in WM, and then performed a choice reaction time task in which they responded either vocally or manually. The stimuli for the choice reaction time task were held constant, but its response modality affected the interference observed in WM: vocal responses interfered with WM for tones and manual responses interfered with WM for locations. These findings indicate that response selection engages domain-specific WM processes and that interference within these processes may account for modality-pairing effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21735042     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0343-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  21 in total

1.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Dual-task interference with equal task emphasis: graded capacity sharing or central postponement?

Authors:  Eric Ruthruff; Harold E Pashler; Eliot Hazeltine
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-07

3.  S-R compatibility: correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes.

Authors:  P M FITTS; R L DEININGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1954-12

4.  Crossmodal action selection: evidence from dual-task compatibility.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Iring Koch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-06

5.  The neural effect of stimulus-response modality compatibility on dual-task performance: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Christine Stelzel; Eric H Schumacher; Torsten Schubert; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-09-21

6.  The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: evidence for content-dependent central interference.

Authors:  Eliot Hazeltine; Eric Ruthruff; Roger W Remington
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Response grouping in the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm: models and contamination effects.

Authors:  Rolf Ulrich; Jeff Miller
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment.

Authors:  François Maquestiaux; Maude Laguë-Beauvais; Eric Ruthruff; Louis Bherer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-10

9.  Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck.

Authors:  H Pashler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Compatibility and resource competition between modalities of input, central processing, and output.

Authors:  C D Wickens; D L Sandry; M Vidulich
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 2.888

View more
  8 in total

1.  Interference effects of stimulus-response modality pairings in dual tasks and their robustness.

Authors:  Christine Stelzel; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-08-03

2.  Talking and driving: applications of crossmodal action reveal a special role for spatial language.

Authors:  Paul Atchley; Jeff Dressel; Todd C Jones; Rebecca A Burson; David Marshall
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-06-28

3.  Crossmodal action: modality matters.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Eliot Hazeltine
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-11

4.  Endogenous control of task-order preparation in variable dual tasks.

Authors:  Tilo Strobach; Sebastian Kübler; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-10-30

5.  Do small dual-task costs reflect ideomotor compatibility or the absence of crosstalk?

Authors:  Kimberly M Halvorson; Eliot Hazeltine
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

Review 6.  Cognitive-Motor Interference in Neurodegenerative Disease: A Narrative Review and Implications for Clinical Management.

Authors:  Tara L McIsaac; Nora E Fritz; Lori Quinn; Lisa M Muratori
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-29

7.  The surprising role of stimulus modality in the dual-task introspective blind spot: a memory account.

Authors:  Donna Bryce; Daniel Bratzke
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-07-13

8.  Cross-modal Action Complexity: Action- and Rule-related Memory Retrieval in Dual-response Control.

Authors:  Aleks Pieczykolan; Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.