Literature DB >> 17899269

Detection of tones in reproducible noise maskers by rabbits and comparison to detection by humans.

Yan Gai1, Laurel H Carney, Kristina S Abrams, Fabio Idrobo, J Michael Harrison, Robert H Gilkey.   

Abstract

Processing mechanisms used for detection of tones in noise can be revealed by using reproducible noise maskers and analyzing the pattern of results across masker waveforms. This study reports detection of a 500-Hz tone in broadband reproducible noise by rabbits using a set of masker waveforms for which human results are available. An appetitive-reinforcement, operant-conditioning procedure with bias control was used. Both fixed-level and roving-level noises were used to explore the utility of energy-related cues for detection. An energy-based detection model was able to partially explain the fixed-level results across reproducible noise waveforms for both rabbit and human. A multiple-channel energy model was able to explain fixed-level results, as well as the robust performance observed with roving-level noises. Further analysis using the energy model indicated a difference between species: human detection was influenced most by the noise spectrum surrounding the tone frequency, whereas rabbit detection was influenced most by the noise spectrum at frequencies above that of the tone. In addition, a temporal envelope-based model predicted detection by humans as well as the single-channel energy model did, but the envelope-based model failed to predict detection by rabbits. This result indicates that the contributions of energy and temporal cues to auditory processing differ across species. Overall, these findings suggest that caution must be used when evaluating neural encoding mechanisms in one species on the basis of behavioral results in another.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17899269      PMCID: PMC2538343          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-007-0096-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  28 in total

1.  A phenomenological model for the responses of auditory-nerve fibers. II. Nonlinear tuning with a frequency glide.

Authors:  Qing Tan; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Time and frequency analyses of auditory signal detection.

Authors:  A Ahumada; R Marken
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory.

Authors:  M C Davison; R D Tustin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Stimuli, reinforcers, and behavior: an integration.

Authors:  M Davison; J Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Studies of binaural detection in the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) with Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  S J Early; C R Mason; L Zheng; M Evilsizer; F Idrobo; J M Harrison; L H Carney
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  CS-dependent response probability in an auditory masked-detection task: considerations based on models of Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  Christine R Mason; Fabio Idrobo; Susan J Early; Ayome Abibi; Ling Zheng; J Michael Harrison; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2003-05

7.  Binaural processing of noisy stimuli: internal/external noise ratios for diotic and dichotic stimuli.

Authors:  R A Siegel; H S Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Models of auditory masking: a molecular psychophysical approach.

Authors:  R H Gilkey; D E Robinson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Eighth nerve fiber firing features in normal-hearing rabbits.

Authors:  E Borg; B Engström; G Linde; K Marklund
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Successive versus simultaneous comparison in auditory intensity discrimination.

Authors:  D M Green; G Kidd; M C Picardi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  5 in total

1.  Suboptimal use of neural information in a mammalian auditory system.

Authors:  Laurel H Carney; Muhammad S A Zilany; Nicholas J Huang; Kristina S Abrams; Fabio Idrobo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Behavioral determination of stimulus pair discrimination of auditory acoustic and electrical stimuli using a classical conditioning and heart-rate approach.

Authors:  Simeon J Morgan; Antonio G Paolini
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Three psychophysical metrics of auditory temporal integration in macaques.

Authors:  Chase Mackey; Alejandro Tarabillo; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.482

4.  Identifying cues for tone-in-noise detection using decision variable correlation in the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kassidy N Amburgey; Kristina S Abrams; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Competing sound sources reveal spatial effects in cortical processing.

Authors:  Ross K Maddox; Cyrus P Billimoria; Ben P Perrone; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Kamal Sen
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 8.029

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.