Literature DB >> 6841795

No sharpening? a challenge for cochlear mechanics.

E de Boer.   

Abstract

Recent data on mechanical movements of the basilar membrane (BM) suggest that the part played in cochlear physiology by a sharpening mechanism is much less important than hitherto has been thought. In an extreme view, one could dispense with a sharpening mechanism completely and assume that (near the threshold) hair-cell excitation is proportional to BM velocity, or a very simple linear transform of it. In the present paper the consequences of this idea are worked out. A theoretical cochlear movement pattern is constructed that shows the same frequency selectivity as an average reverse-correlation function of an auditory nerve fiber. This response is called a revcor-spectrumlike response. Cochlear mechanics is then simplified to a pure shortwave model. It is shown that, if the cochlea model should present a revcor-spectrumlike response, this can only be achieved when the resistance component of the BM impedance is negative over a part of the length of the cochlea. This result is refined in several respects, and it is shown that a model equipped with the right kind of BM impedance function can have a response of the required type. It remains difficult to conceive of a physiological mechanism that would cause the desired effect on the BM impedance.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6841795     DOI: 10.1121/1.389002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  The spatial and temporal representation of a tone on the guinea pig basilar membrane.

Authors:  K E Nilsen; I J Russell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Otoacoustic emissions from residual oscillations of the cochlear basilar membrane in a human ear model.

Authors:  Renato Nobili; Ales Vetesnik; Lorenzo Turicchia; Fabio Mammano
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

4.  On ringing limits of the auditory periphery.

Authors:  E de Boer; C Kruidenier
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 5.  A critique of the critical cochlea: Hopf--a bifurcation--is better than none.

Authors:  A J Hudspeth; Frank Jülicher; Pascal Martin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Physics underlying the physiology of the ear.

Authors:  Egbert de Boer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Nonlinear feedback models for the tuning of auditory nerve fibers.

Authors:  L H Carney; M Friedman
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  The location of the cochlear amplifier: spatial representation of a single tone on the guinea pig basilar membrane.

Authors:  I J Russell; K E Nilsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-03-18       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A fast motile response in guinea-pig outer hair cells: the cellular basis of the cochlear amplifier.

Authors:  J F Ashmore
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Contribution of active hair-bundle motility to nonlinear amplification in the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  Fumiaki Nin; Tobias Reichenbach; Jonathan A N Fisher; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.