Literature DB >> 6830219

Frequency distribution of coliforms in water distribution systems.

R R Christian, W O Pipes.   

Abstract

Nine small water distribution systems were sampled intensively to determine the patterns of dispersion of coliforms. The frequency distributions of confirmed coliform counts were compatible with either the negative-binomial or the lognormal distribution. They were not compatible with either the Poisson or Poisson-plus-added zeroes distribution. The implications of the use of the lognormal distributional model were further evaluated because of its previous use in water quality studies. The geometric means from 14 data sets ranged from 10(-6) to 0.2 coliforms per 100 ml, and the geometric standard deviations were between 10 and 100, with one exception. If the lognormal model is representative of the coliform distribution; the arithmetic mean sample count is a poor estimator of the true mean coliform density, and the probability of water in a distribution system containing small patches with large coliform densities without detection by routine monitoring is finite. These conclusions have direct bearing on the interpretation of microbiological quality standards for drinking water.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6830219      PMCID: PMC242331          DOI: 10.1128/aem.45.2.603-609.1983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  1 in total

1.  Bacterial density in water determined by poisson or negative binomial distributions.

Authors:  A H El-Shaarawi; S R Esterby; B J Dutka
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 4.792

  1 in total
  10 in total

1.  True and false positive rates in maximum contaminant level tests.

Authors:  J Oler
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Comparison of bacterial indicators and sampling programs for drinking water systems.

Authors:  J F Collin; D Zmirou; J P Ferley; M Charrel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Comparison of Clark's presence-absence test and the membrane filter method for coliform detection in potable water samples.

Authors:  W O Pipes; H A Minnigh; B Moyer; M A Troy
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Enumeration of total coliforms and Escherichia coli from source water by the defined substrate technology.

Authors:  S C Edberg; M J Allen; D B Smith; N J Kriz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Some goodness-of-fit methods for the Poisson plus added zeros distribution.

Authors:  A H el-Shaarawi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Phenotypic characteristics of coliform and noncoliform bacteria from a public water supply compared with regional and national clinical species.

Authors:  S C Edberg; V Piscitelli; M Cartter
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Agreement, precision, and accuracy of epifluorescence microscopy methods for enumeration of total bacterial numbers.

Authors:  Eun-Young Seo; Tae-Seok Ahn; Young-Gun Zo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Comparison of membrane filtration and Autoanalysis Colilert presence-absence techniques for analysis of total coliforms and Escherichia coli in drinking water samples.

Authors:  C M Lewis; J L Mak
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  National field evaluation of a defined substrate method for the simultaneous detection of total coliforms and Escherichia coli from drinking water: comparison with presence-absence techniques.

Authors:  S C Edberg; M J Allen; D B Smith
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  High adherence is necessary to realize health gains from water quality interventions.

Authors:  Joe Brown; Thomas Clasen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.