Literature DB >> 6829737

Effects of stimulus repetition rate on the auditory brain stem responses (ABR).

G Paludetti, M Maurizi, F Ottaviani.   

Abstract

Brain stem auditory evoked potentials were recorded from 26 normal subjects who listened to 100 ms clicks at 10, 20, 50, and 100 repetitions per second at varying intensities. A 0.5+/-0.3 ms shift of the V wave latency was observed between 10 clicks per second and 100 clicks per second; a lesser difference was found when the repetition rate was shifted between 10 to 50, 20 to 50, or 20 to 100 clicks per second. No significant differences were observed when the repetition rate moved from 10 to 20 or between 50 and 100 clicks per second. Whatever latency shifts were observed appeared to be independent of the stimulus intensity. Waveform morphology seemed to be the same between 10 and 20 clicks per second, with only minor changes observed at the 50 clicks per second rate. At 100 clicks per second a decrease or a complete disappearance of some components or both was seen. These changes are accounted for by peripheral phenomena for the most part, and a number of clinical applications are suggested based on these observations.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6829737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otol        ISSN: 0192-9763


  8 in total

1.  The use of QSD (q-sequence deconvolution) to recover superposed, transient evoked-responses.

Authors:  Don L Jewett; Gideon Caplovitz; Bill Baird; Michael Trumpis; Marram P Olson; Linda J Larson-Prior
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Optimizing Auditory Brainstem Response Acquisition Using Interleaved Frequencies.

Authors:  Brad N Buran; Sean Elkins; J Beth Kempton; Edward V Porsov; John V Brigande; Stephen V David
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-09

3.  The effects of preceding lead-alone and lag-alone click trains on the buildup of echo suppression.

Authors:  Christopher W Bishop; Deepak Yadav; Sam London; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The auditory brainstem responses in patients with unilateral cochlear hearing loss.

Authors:  M Sinan Yilmaz; Mehmet Guven; Suleyman Cesur; Haldun Oguz
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-12-04

5.  Associations between prenatal and recent postnatal methylmercury exposure and auditory function at age 19 years in the Seychelles Child Development Study.

Authors:  Mark S Orlando; Adam C Dziorny; Donald Harrington; Tanzy Love; Conrad F Shamlaye; Gene E Watson; Edwin van Wijngaarden; Philip W Davidson; Gary J Myers
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.763

6.  The Use of Middle Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials (MLAEP) as Methodology for Evaluating Sedation Level in Propofol-Drug Induced Sleep Endoscopy (DISE) Procedure.

Authors:  Michele Arigliani; Domenico M Toraldo; Enrico Ciavolino; Caterina Lattante; Luana Conte; Serena Arima; Caterina Arigliani; Antonio Palumbo; Michele De Benedetto
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  The Effects of Stimulus Rate on ABR Morphology and its Relationship to P1 CAEP Responses and Auditory Speech Perception Outcomes in Children with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder: Evidence from Case Reports.

Authors:  Rosemary J McKnight; Hannah Glick; Garrett Cardon; Anu Sharma
Journal:  Hearing Balance Commun       Date:  2017-12-22

8.  Effects of Aging Versus Noise Exposure on Auditory System in Individuals With Normal Audiometric Thresholds.

Authors:  Kondli Nagaraj Megha; Suprabha Kappadi; Ganapathy Mechiyanda Kaverappa; Sreeraj Konadath
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 1.017

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.