Literature DB >> 32953369

The Effects of Stimulus Rate on ABR Morphology and its Relationship to P1 CAEP Responses and Auditory Speech Perception Outcomes in Children with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder: Evidence from Case Reports.

Rosemary J McKnight1, Hannah Glick1, Garrett Cardon2, Anu Sharma1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder (ANSD) affects approximately 5-15% of children with sensorineural hearing loss. ANSD is characterized by the presence of otoacoustic emissions (OAE) and an absent or abnormal auditory brainstem response (ABR). The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of slow-rate ABR in predicting the auditory cortical development and auditory speech perception outcomes in case studies of children with ANSD.
DESIGN: ABR waveform characteristics were collected at slow stimulation rates (5.1 clicks/second) and a fast stimulation rates (>11-31.1 clicks/second, rates typically used in a clinical setting) in 3 case reports of children with ANSD. P1 CAEP responses and measures of auditory speech perception using the Infant Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (IT-MAIS) were also collected in these children. Retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate the prognostic value of slow- versus fast-rate ABR in predicting P1 CAEP responses and auditory speech perception outcomes in these children. STUDY SAMPLE: Participants included case reports of 3 pediatric participants with a clinical diagnosis of ANSD.
RESULTS: Slow-rate ABR did not elicit significant improvements in waveform morphology compared to fast-rate ABR. P1 CAEP results were present in 2 out of 3 cases and were consistent with auditory speech perception outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Even when ABR stimulation rates were slowed, ABR responses in these children with ANSD did not display any characteristic or replicable pattern, and ABR responses were not predictive of cortical auditory maturation or behavioral performance. In contrast, P1 CAEP responses provided valuable information regarding the maturational status of the auditory cortex and P1 CAEP responses were consistent with behavioral measures of auditory speech perception. Overall, results highlight the high prognostic value of P1 CAEP testing when used in conjunction with behavioral measures of auditory speech perception in children with ANSD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  P1 cortical auditory evoked potential (P1 CAEP); auditory brainstem response (ABR); auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD); stimulus rate

Year:  2017        PMID: 32953369      PMCID: PMC7500459          DOI: 10.1080/21695717.2017.1418803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hearing Balance Commun        ISSN: 2169-5717


  41 in total

1.  Assessing cochlear implant benefit in very young children.

Authors:  S Zimmerman-Phillips; A M Robbins; M J Osberger
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2000-12

2.  Maturation of human central auditory system activity: separating auditory evoked potentials by dipole source modeling.

Authors:  Curtis Ponton; Jos J Eggermont; Deepak Khosla; Betty Kwong; Manuel Don
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Cochlear receptor (microphonic and summating potentials, otoacoustic emissions) and auditory pathway (auditory brain stem potentials) activity in auditory neuropathy.

Authors:  A Starr; Y Sininger; T Nguyen; H J Michalewski; S Oba; C Abdala
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Cortical maturation and behavioral outcomes in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Anu Sharma; Garrett Cardon; Kathryn Henion; Peter Roland
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Auditory brainstem responses from children three months to three years of age: normal patterns of response. II.

Authors:  M P Gorga; J R Kaminski; K L Beauchaine; W Jesteadt; S T Neely
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1989-06

Review 6.  Cortical development and neuroplasticity in Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Anu Sharma; Garrett Cardon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Developmental changes in P1 and N1 central auditory responses elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.

Authors:  A Sharma; N Kraus; T J McGee; T G Nicol
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-11

8.  Consequences of neural asynchrony: a case of auditory neuropathy.

Authors:  N Kraus; A R Bradlow; M A Cheatham; J Cunningham; C D King; D B Koch; T G Nicol; T J Mcgee; L K Stein; B A Wright
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2000-08

9.  Auditory neuropathy.

Authors:  A Starr; T W Picton; Y Sininger; L J Hood; C I Berlin
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Inter-trial coherence as a marker of cortical phase synchrony in children with sensorineural hearing loss and auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder fitted with hearing aids and cochlear implants.

Authors:  Amy Nash-Kille; Anu Sharma
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.