Literature DB >> 6787898

CT determination of femoral torsion.

R J Hernandez, M O Tachdjian, A K Poznanski, L S Dias.   

Abstract

Femoral torsion has been measured in infants and children by computed tomography. The method requires two scans, one through the femoral neck, another through the femoral condyles. A specially designed device and packing about the knees assures immobilization of the legs. Slight variations in the positions of the sections in the neck and condyles do not alter the measurement significantly. Intraobserver and interobserver errors are low, 2 degrees and 3 degrees mean error, respectively. The radiation required involves small tissue volumes at about 1.7 R (4.4 x 10(-4) C/kg). Measurements are more difficult when the femoral necks are short or vertically oriented. The method appears to have sufficient accuracy for clinical purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6787898     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.137.1.97

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  43 in total

1.  CT measurements prior to computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty do not improve rotational placement of the femoral component.

Authors:  A de Ladoucette
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Measuring physiological and pathological femoral anteversion using a biplanar low-dose X-ray system: validity, reliability, and discriminative ability in cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Matthias Thépaut; Sylvain Brochard; Julien Leboucher; Mathieu Lempereur; Eric Stindel; Valentin Tissot; Bhushan S Borotikar
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Three-dimensional biplanar radiography as a new means of accessing femoral version: a comparitive study of EOS three-dimensional radiography versus computed tomography.

Authors:  M Lucius Pomerantz; Diana Glaser; Josh Doan; Sita Kumar; Eric W Edmonds
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Differences in Femoral Torsion Among Various Measurement Methods Increase in Hips With Excessive Femoral Torsion.

Authors:  Florian Schmaranzer; Till D Lerch; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast; Simon D Steppacher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Proximal femoral anatomy in the normal human population.

Authors:  Paul A Toogood; Anthony Skalak; Daniel R Cooperman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Reliability of the assessment of lower limb torsion using computed tomography: analysis of five different techniques.

Authors:  Emmanouil Liodakis; Iosifina Doxastaki; Kongfai Chu; Christian Krettek; Ralph Gaulke; Musa Citak; Mohamed Kenawey
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  A cadaver study validating CT assessment of acetabular component orientation: the Perth CT hip protocol.

Authors:  Varun Arora; Richard Hannan; Richard Beaver; Timothy Fletcher; Paul Harvie
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  A new method using medical ultrasound for measuring femoral anteversion (torsion): technique and reliability. An intra-observer and inter-observer study on dried bones from human adults.

Authors:  S S Upadhyay; T O'Neil; R G Burwell; A Moulton
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Robot-assisted fracture reduction: a preliminary study in the femur shaft.

Authors:  T Gosling; R Westphal; T Hufner; J Faulstich; M Kfuri; F Wahl; C Krettek
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  [Analysis of the axis in patients with patellar dislocation].

Authors:  H H Jend; H Schöttle; J Bahnsen; W Crone-Münzebrock
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie       Date:  1986-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.