Literature DB >> 15742728

Robot-assisted fracture reduction: a preliminary study in the femur shaft.

T Gosling1, R Westphal, T Hufner, J Faulstich, M Kfuri, F Wahl, C Krettek.   

Abstract

Reduction in femoral shaft fractures can be difficult to achieve with minimally invasive techniques. Malalignment and high intra-operative radiation exposure can result. The hypothesis was that robot-assisted fracture reduction could improve the quality of reduction while reducing the amount of radiation exposure. A robot system was developed that allows fracture manipulation with a joystick as input device. The system provides the surgeon with haptic and metric feedback. Fifteen synthetic femurs were broken and reduced by simulated open (group A) and closed techniques (group B). These techniques were compared with the robot-assisted reduction with (group C) and without (group D) haptic and metric information. An image intensifier was simulated with two orthogonal cameras. All reduction techniques showed minor malalignment. In group C, the alignment was: procurvatum/recurvatum 0.6 degrees (0-2.0 degrees); varus/valgus 0.8 degrees (0-3.0 degrees); and axial rotation 0.8 degrees (0-3.1 degrees). A significant difference was seen between the groups (two-way ANOVA, p < 0.001). Axial rotation was significantly lower in group C than in group B (1.9 degrees; p < 0.001). The residual varus and valgus deviation was higher in group C compared with group A (0.4 degrees, p = 0.03). The median number of simulated radiographs was significantly less in group C (35) compared with group D (72; p < 0.001) and group B (49; p = 0.01). Robot-assisted fracture reduction of the femur provides high precision in alignment while reducing the amount of intraoperative imaging. Further research in this field is worthwhile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15742728     DOI: 10.1007/bf02345131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  21 in total

1.  Fracture reduction and deformity correction with the hexapod Ilizarov fixator.

Authors:  K Seide; D Wolter; H R Kortmann
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Erectile dysfunction induced by orthopedic trauma managed with a fracture table.

Authors:  R J Gibson
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2000-03

3.  Robotically-milled bone cavities: a comparison with hand-broaching in different types of cementless hip stems.

Authors:  Marc N Thomsen; Steffen J Breusch; Peter R Aldinger; Wolfgang Görtz; Andreas Lahmer; Mathias Honl; Andreas Birke; Hans Nägerl
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2002-08

4.  Prevention of malrotation deformity in femoral shaft fracture.

Authors:  K H Yang; D Y Han; J S Jahng; D E Shin; J H Park
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Electrophysiological analysis of pudendal neuropathy following traction.

Authors:  G Amarenco; S S Ismael; B Bayle; P Denys; J Kerdraon
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.217

6.  Reamed intramedullary nailing of the femur: 551 cases.

Authors:  P R Wolinsky; E McCarty; Y Shyr; K Johnson
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1999-03

7.  Closed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. A report of five hundred and twenty cases.

Authors:  R A Winquist; S T Hansen; D K Clawson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Compartment syndrome in the well leg resulting from fracture-table positioning.

Authors:  J Anglen; J Banovetz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Closed locked intramedullary nailing. Its application to comminuted fractures of the femur.

Authors:  I Kempf; A Grosse; G Beck
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  A prospective study of fractures of the femoral shaft treated with a static, intramedullary, interlocking nail comparing one versus two distal screws.

Authors:  J Grover; D A Wiss
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.472

View more
  6 in total

1.  Robotic technique improves entry point alignment for intramedullary nailing of femur fractures compared to the conventional technique: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Eduardo M Suero; Ralf Westphal; Musa Citak; Nael Hawi; Emmanouil Liodakis; Christian Krettek; Timo Stuebig
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-08-11

Review 2.  Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Farshid Amirabdollahian; Salvatore Livatino; Behrad Vahedi; Radhika Gudipati; Patrick Sheen; Shan Gawrie-Mohan; Nikhil Vasdev
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-12-01

3.  Statistical atlas-based morphological variation analysis of the asian humerus: towards consistent allometric implant positioning.

Authors:  K Wu; K L Wong; S J K Ng; S T Quek; B Zhou; D P Murphy; Z J Daruwalla; H Ren
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Repeatability and reproducibility of a telemanipulated fracture reduction system.

Authors:  Eduardo M Suero; Ralf Westphal; Musa Citak; Volker Stueber; Ullrich Lueke; Christian Krettek; Timo Stuebig
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-09-09

5.  Computer-assisted Femur Fracture Reduction.

Authors:  Johannes Frank; Bernd Gritzbach; Christian Winter; Bernd Maier; Ingo Marzi
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 6.  Medical Robotics in Bone Fracture Reduction Surgery: A Review.

Authors:  Long Bai; Jianxing Yang; Xiaohong Chen; Yuanxi Sun; Xingyu Li
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-18       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.