Literature DB >> 18758876

Proximal femoral anatomy in the normal human population.

Paul A Toogood1, Anthony Skalak, Daniel R Cooperman.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In this study, we developed a complete description of the morphology of the proximal femur. Then, using this framework, we (1) determined normal population means, standard deviations, and ranges; (2) established differences among subpopulations; and (3) showed correlations among the various measurements. To accomplish these objectives, we analyzed 375 adult femurs. Specimens were digitally photographed in standardized positions, measurements being obtained using ImageJ software. Three parameters of the head-neck relationship were assessed. Translation was examined through four raw offset measurements (anterior, posterior, superior, inferior) used to calculate anterior-posterior and superior-inferior ratios. Rotation was investigated through anteroposterior (AP) and lateral physeal angles. Concavity was examined using alpha, beta, gamma, and delta angles. Two parameters of the neck-shaft relationship were assessed, neck version and angle of inclination. Average anterior-posterior and superior-inferior ratios were 1.14 and 0.90. Average AP and lateral physeal angles were 74.33 degrees and 81.83 degrees , respectively. Averages for alpha, beta, gamma, and delta angles were 45.61 degrees , 41.85 degrees , 53.46 degrees , and 42.95 degrees , respectively. Average neck version and angle of inclination were 9.73 degrees and 129.23 degrees , respectively. Differences existed between males and females and between those younger and older than 50 years. Correlations were observed between translation and concavity, and translation and the neck-shaft relationships. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18758876      PMCID: PMC2650061          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0473-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  22 in total

1.  Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: early mechanical damage to the acetabular cartilage by a prominent femoral metaphysis.

Authors:  M Leunig; M M Casillas; M Hamlet; O Hersche; H Nötzli; T Slongo; R Ganz
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2000-08

2.  Roentgen examination of the proximal femur end in children and adolescents; a standardized technique also suitable for determination of the collum-, anteversion-, and epiphyseal angles; a study of slipped epiphysis and coxa plana.

Authors:  L BILLING
Journal:  Acta Radiol Suppl       Date:  1954

3.  Anteversion of the neck of the femur; a method of measurement.

Authors:  D M DUNN
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1952-05

4.  Measuring femoral anteversion; the problem and a method.

Authors:  C T RYDER; L CRANE
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1953-04       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Abnormal extension of the femoral head epiphysis as a cause of cam impingement.

Authors:  K A Siebenrock; K H A Wahab; S Werlen; M Kalhor; M Leunig; R Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Remarks on AETIOLOGICAL FACTORS IN OSTEO-ARTHRITIS OF THE HIP-JOINT.

Authors:  R C Elmslie
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1933-01-07

7.  Femoral anteversion.

Authors:  S B Murphy; S R Simon; P K Kijewski; R H Wilkinson; N T Griscom
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  The aetiology of primary osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  R O Murray
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Athletic activity in adolescence as an etiological factor in degenerative hip disease.

Authors:  R O Murray; C Duncan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1971-08

10.  Anatomy of the femoral neck and head, with comparative data from Caucasians and Hong Kong Chinese.

Authors:  F T Hoaglund; W D Low
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  55 in total

Review 1.  The femoral neck-shaft angle on plain radiographs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christoph Kolja Boese; Jens Dargel; Johannes Oppermann; Peer Eysel; Max Joseph Scheyerer; Jan Bredow; Philipp Lechler
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Femoral head-neck junction deformity is related to osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  Hilton José Melo Barros; Gilberto Luis Camanho; Antônio Carlos Bernabé; Marcelo Bordalo Rodrigues; Luiz Eugênio Garcez Leme
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Are the left and right proximal femurs symmetric?

Authors:  Ernest Y Young; Jeremy Gebhart; Daniel Cooperman; Nicholas U Ahn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Reliability of overcoverage parameters with varying morphologic pincer features: comparison of EOS® and radiography.

Authors:  Shafagh Monazzam; Mandar Agashe; Harish S Hosalkar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The gymnasts' hip and groin: a magnetic resonance imaging study in asymptomatic elite athletes.

Authors:  A Papavasiliou; T Siatras; A Bintoudi; D Milosis; V Lallas; E Sykaras; A Karantanas
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Hip shape is symmetric, non-dependent on limb dominance and gender-specific: implications for femoroacetabular impingement. A 3D CT analysis in asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Vasco V Mascarenhas; Paulo Rego; Pedro Dantas; Miguel Castro; Lennart Jans; Rui M Marques; Nélia Gouveia; Francisco Soldado; Olufemi R Ayeni; José G Consciência
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Clinical tests to determine femoral version category in people with chronic hip joint pain and asymptomatic controls.

Authors:  Alexandria Uding; Nancy J Bloom; Paul K Commean; Travis J Hillen; Jacqueline D Patterson; John C Clohisy; Marcie Harris-Hayes
Journal:  Musculoskelet Sci Pract       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.520

8.  Femoral head-neck offset measurements in 339 subjects: distribution and implications for femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Christian R Fraitzl; Thomas Kappe; Friederike Pennekamp; Heiko Reichel; Christian Billich
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Femoral neck shaft angle width is associated with hip-fracture risk in males but not independently of femoral neck bone density.

Authors:  C Ripamonti; L Lisi; M Avella
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  What Are the Reference Values and Associated Factors for Center-edge Angle and Alpha Angle? A Population-based Study.

Authors:  Cornelius Sebastian Fischer; Jens-Peter Kühn; Till Ittermann; Carsten-Oliver Schmidt; Denis Gümbel; Richard Kasch; Matthias Frank; René Laqua; Peter Hinz; Jörn Lange
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.