Literature DB >> 10485883

Efficient adaptational demethylation of chemoreceptors requires the same enzyme-docking site as efficient methylation.

A N Barnakov1, L A Barnakova, G L Hazelbauer.   

Abstract

The mechanistic basis of sensory adaptation and gradient sensing in bacterial chemotaxis is reversible covalent modification of transmembrane chemoreceptors, methylation, and demethylation at specific glutamyl residues in their cytoplasmic domains. These reactions are catalyzed by a dedicated methyltransferase CheR and a dedicated methylesterase CheB. The esterase is also a deamidase that creates certain methyl-accepting glutamyls by hydrolysis of glutamine side chains. We investigated the action of CheB and its activated form, phospho-CheB, on a truncated form of the aspartate receptor of Escherichia coli that was missing the last 5 aa of the intact receptor. The deleted pentapeptide is conserved in several chemoreceptors in enteric and related bacteria. The truncated receptor was much less efficiently demethylated and deamidated than intact receptor, but essentially was unperturbed for kinase activation or transmembrane signaling. CheB bound specifically to an affinity column carrying the isolated pentapeptide, implying that in the intact receptor the pentapeptide serves as a docking site for the methylesterase/deamidase and that the truncated receptor was inefficiently modified because the enzyme could not dock. It is striking that the same pentapeptide serves as an activity-enhancing docking site for the methyltransferase CheR, the other enzyme involved in adaptational covalent modification of chemoreceptors. A shared docking site raises the tantalizing possibility that relative rates of methylation and demethylation could be influenced by competition between the two enzymes at that site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10485883      PMCID: PMC17940          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.19.10667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  40 in total

1.  Assembly of an MCP receptor, CheW, and kinase CheA complex in the bacterial chemotaxis signal transduction pathway.

Authors:  J A Gegner; D R Graham; A F Roth; F W Dahlquist
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-09-18       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Signal transduction in bacteria: CheW forms a reversible complex with the protein kinase CheA.

Authors:  J A Gegner; F W Dahlquist
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Coupling of receptor function to phosphate-transfer reactions in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  K A Borkovich; M I Simon
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.600

4.  Phosphorylation of an N-terminal regulatory domain activates the CheB methylesterase in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  A Lupas; J Stock
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1989-10-15       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  The response regulators CheB and CheY exhibit competitive binding to the kinase CheA.

Authors:  J Li; R V Swanson; M I Simon; R M Weis
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1995-11-14       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Polar location of the chemoreceptor complex in the Escherichia coli cell.

Authors:  J R Maddock; L Shapiro
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-03-19       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Assembly and function of a quaternary signal transduction complex monitored by surface plasmon resonance.

Authors:  S C Schuster; R V Swanson; L A Alex; R B Bourret; M I Simon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-09-23       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Signal transduction schemes of bacteria.

Authors:  J S Parkinson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-06-04       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Effects of glutamines and glutamates at sites of covalent modification of a methyl-accepting transducer.

Authors:  C Park; D P Dutton; G L Hazelbauer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Attenuation of sensory receptor signaling by covalent modification.

Authors:  K A Borkovich; L A Alex; M I Simon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  42 in total

1.  Substitutions in the periplasmic domain of low-abundance chemoreceptor trg that induce or reduce transmembrane signaling: kinase activation and context effects.

Authors:  B D Beel; G L Hazelbauer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 2.  Transmembrane signaling in bacterial chemoreceptors.

Authors:  J J Falke; G L Hazelbauer
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 13.807

Review 3.  How signals are heard during bacterial chemotaxis: protein-protein interactions in sensory signal propagation.

Authors:  A Bren; M Eisenbach
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Attractant regulation of the aspartate receptor-kinase complex: limited cooperative interactions between receptors and effects of the receptor modification state.

Authors:  J A Bornhorst; J J Falke
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-08-08       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Binding and diffusion of CheR molecules within a cluster of membrane receptors.

Authors:  Matthew D Levin; Thomas S Shimizu; Dennis Bray
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Perfect and near-perfect adaptation in a model of bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Bernardo A Mello; Yuhai Tu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  A dynamic-signaling-team model for chemotaxis receptors in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Clinton H Hansen; Victor Sourjik; Ned S Wingreen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Spatial organization in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Victor Sourjik; Judith P Armitage
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Three-dimensional structure and organization of a receptor/signaling complex.

Authors:  Noreen R Francis; Peter M Wolanin; Jeffry B Stock; David J Derosier; Dennis R Thomas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Carboxyl-terminal extensions beyond the conserved pentapeptide reduce rates of chemoreceptor adaptational modification.

Authors:  Wing-Cheung Lai; Gerald L Hazelbauer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.