Literature DB >> 6756125

Evaluation of the antimicrobial removal device when used with the BACTEC blood culture system.

C L Strand.   

Abstract

A study to determine the value of the Antimicrobial Removal Device (ARD) used in conjunction with radiometric detection of bacteremia using three media was conducted. During a 12-month period, 622 duplicate ARD/BACTEC blood-culture sets were collected. There were 88 positive cultures that yielded 68 pathogenic isolates and 28 probable contaminant isolates. When all patients were considered, 31 pathogenic isolates were detected by both systems, 25 pathogenic isolates were detected faster or only by the BACTEC system, and 12 pathogenic isolates were detected faster or only when the ARD was employed. This difference is statistically significant (P less than 0.05). Thus, the standard BACTEC blood-culture system using three different media was superior to the same BACTEC system using ARD-processed blood specimens. When only patients receiving antimicrobial therapy were considered, there were more pathogenic isolates detected from unprocessed blood than from blood processed in the ARD; however, this difference was not statistically significant. In conclusion, there appears to be no advantage to using the ARD system in conjunction with the three-bottle BACTEC blood-culture system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6756125     DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/78.6.853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  8 in total

1.  Routine evaluation of BACTEC NR-16A and NR-17A media.

Authors:  R J Courcol; A V Durocher; M Roussel-Delvallez; A Fruchart; G R Martin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Effectiveness of resins in removing antibiotics from blood cultures.

Authors:  O Crepin; M Roussel-Delvallez; G R Martin; R J Courcol
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of new blood culture processing systems.

Authors:  J A Moody; C E Fasching; C J Shanholtzer; D N Gerding; L R Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Detection of bacteremia in patients receiving antimicrobial therapy: an evaluation of the antimicrobial removal device and 16B medium.

Authors:  G V Doern; N M Gantz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Is the antimicrobial removal device a cost-effective addition to conventional blood cultures?

Authors:  R Munro; P J Collignon; T C Sorrell; P Tomlinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Clinical importance of increased sensitivity of BacT/Alert FAN aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles.

Authors:  L C McDonald; J Fune; L B Gaido; M P Weinstein; L G Reimer; T M Flynn; M L Wilson; S Mirrett; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Use of the antimicrobial removal device prior to blood culture in patients on antibiotic therapy.

Authors:  S Ringertz; B Eriksson; A S Malmborg; S Nyström; B Wretlind
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Controlled evaluation of BacT/alert standard anaerobic and FAN anaerobic blood culture bottles for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia.

Authors:  M L Wilson; M P Weinstein; S Mirrett; L G Reimer; R J Feldman; C R Chuard; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.948

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.