Literature DB >> 4092699

Use of the antimicrobial removal device prior to blood culture in patients on antibiotic therapy.

S Ringertz, B Eriksson, A S Malmborg, S Nyström, B Wretlind.   

Abstract

The efficacy of the antimicrobial removal device in facilitating isolation of bacteria from blood containing antibiotics was evaluated in a multicenter study. Blood specimens from 143 patients who had culture-proven septicemia and had been on antibiotic treatment for at least 24 hours were recultured with and without the aid of the device. Septicemia persisted in 33 of the patients and use of the device improved the isolation rates: 63% of the gram-positive bacteria and 32% of the gram-negative bacteria were isolated only with the aid of the device. Use of the device was an advantage in 10 of 13 cases where the antibiotic concentration in the bottles exceeded the MIC for the infecting microorganism but in only 5 of 19 cases where the concentration was lower than the MIC. It is concluded that the antimicrobial removal device may be useful in patients already on antibiotic treatment, but that its use is limited by the cost and the amount of work involved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4092699     DOI: 10.1007/BF02013391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0722-2211            Impact factor:   3.267


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of a micromethod for determination of antibiotic concentrations in plasma.

Authors:  B Jalling; A S Malmborg; A Lindman; L O Boréus
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Evaluation of new blood culture processing systems.

Authors:  J A Moody; C E Fasching; C J Shanholtzer; D N Gerding; L R Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparative determination of sulfonamide concentration in serum by chemical and microbiological assay.

Authors:  A S Malmborg; A Rane
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis       Date:  1984

4.  Evaluation of the antimicrobial removal device when used with the BACTEC blood culture system.

Authors:  C L Strand
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Rapid isolation of bacteria from septicemic patients by use of an antimicrobial agent removal device.

Authors:  C Wallis; J L Melnick; R D Wende; P E Riely
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  The antimicrobial removal device. A microbiological and clinical evaluation.

Authors:  A J Wright; R L Thompson; C A McLimans; W R Wilson; J A Washington
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  In vitro antibiotic removal and bacterial recovery from blood with an antibiotic removal device.

Authors:  N J Lindsey; P E Riely
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Rapid, reproducible enzyme immunoassay for gentamicin.

Authors:  D Phaneuf; E Francke; H C Neu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Blood culture positivity: suppression by outpatient antibiotic therapy in patients with bacterial endocarditis.

Authors:  G J Pazin; S Saul; M E Thompson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1982-02

10.  Improved recovery of microorganisms from patients receiving antibiotics with the antimicrobial removal device.

Authors:  L R Peterson; C J Shanholtzer; M L Mohn; D N Gerding
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 2.493

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Controlled evaluation of BacT/alert standard anaerobic and FAN anaerobic blood culture bottles for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia.

Authors:  M L Wilson; M P Weinstein; S Mirrett; L G Reimer; R J Feldman; C R Chuard; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.948

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.