Literature DB >> 6350353

Detection of bacteremia in patients receiving antimicrobial therapy: an evaluation of the antimicrobial removal device and 16B medium.

G V Doern, N M Gantz.   

Abstract

A total of 1097 blood specimens obtained from patients receiving antibacterial antimicrobial agents were processed by three blood culture systems: standard aerobic and anaerobic radiometric media, resin-containing radiometric medium (16B; Johnston Laboratories, Cockeysville, Md.), and aerobic and anaerobic radiometric media inoculated with blood processed in an Antimicrobial Removal Device (Marion Laboratories, Kansas City, Mo.). A total of 73 cultures, representing 45 unique septic episodes, yielded 81 clinically significant organisms. Forty-six organisms (28 septic episodes) were recovered in standard radiometric medium. 16B medium yielded 63 organisms (37 septic episodes). Sixty-nine organisms (42 septic episodes) were isolated from radiometric blood cultures inoculated with Antimicrobial Removal Device-processed blood. Contamination rates were not significantly different among the three systems. In comparison with standard radiometric blood cultures, the length of time to detection of positive blood cultures was shorter with both 16B medium and with Antimicrobial Removal Device-processed cultures. Comparison of the latter two systems suggested enhanced recovery of clinically significant organisms in radiometric blood cultures inoculated with blood processed in the Antimicrobial Removal Device. There was no difference in the length of time to detection of positive blood cultures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6350353      PMCID: PMC270742          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.18.1.43-48.1983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  8 in total

1.  UNMASKING OF FALSE-NEGATIVE BLOOD CULTURES IN PATIENTS RECEIVING NEW PENICILLINS.

Authors:  J CARLETON; M HAMBURGER
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1963-10-12       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Effect of sodium polyanethol sulfonate in blood cultures.

Authors:  J Eng
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of the antimicrobial removal device when used with the BACTEC blood culture system.

Authors:  C L Strand
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Rapid isolation of bacteria from septicemic patients by use of an antimicrobial agent removal device.

Authors:  C Wallis; J L Melnick; R D Wende; P E Riely
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  The antimicrobial removal device. A microbiological and clinical evaluation.

Authors:  A J Wright; R L Thompson; C A McLimans; W R Wilson; J A Washington
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Evaluation of the Antibiotic Removal Device.

Authors:  M D Appleman; R S Swinney; P N Heseltine
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  In vitro antibiotic removal and bacterial recovery from blood with an antibiotic removal device.

Authors:  N J Lindsey; P E Riely
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Enhanced detection of bacteremia with a new BACTEC resin blood culture medium.

Authors:  P C Appelbaum; D G Beckwith; J R Dipersio; J W Dyke; J F Salventi; L L Stone
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 5.948

  8 in total
  15 in total

1.  Advantage of combining resin with lytic BACTEC blood culture media.

Authors:  P Rohner; B Pepey; R Auckenthaler
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Controlled comparative evaluation of BacT/Alert FAN and ESP 80A aerobic media as means for detecting bacteremia and fungemia.

Authors:  G V Doern; A Barton; S Rao
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of five days versus seven days of incubation for detection of positive blood cultures by the Bactec 9240 system.

Authors:  A H Huang; J J Yan; J J Wu
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Controlled evaluation of BACTEC Plus 26 and Roche Septi-Chek aerobic blood culture bottles.

Authors:  M P Weinstein; S Mirrett; M L Wilson; L J Harrell; C W Stratton; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Routine evaluation of BACTEC NR-16A and NR-17A media.

Authors:  R J Courcol; A V Durocher; M Roussel-Delvallez; A Fruchart; G R Martin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Clinical comparison of lysis-centrifugation and radiometric resin systems for blood culture.

Authors:  P Brannon; T E Kiehn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Current controversies in the detection of septicemia.

Authors:  G Pierce; P R Murray
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Controlled clinical laboratory comparison of BACTEC plus aerobic/F resin medium with BacT/Alert aerobic FAN medium for detection of bacteremia and fungemia.

Authors:  J H Jorgensen; S Mirrett; L C McDonald; P R Murray; M P Weinstein; J Fune; C W Trippy; M Masterson; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Evaluation of new blood culture processing systems.

Authors:  J A Moody; C E Fasching; C J Shanholtzer; D N Gerding; L R Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Performance of two resin-containing blood culture media in detection of bloodstream infections and in direct matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) broth assays for isolate identification: clinical comparison of the BacT/Alert Plus and Bactec Plus systems.

Authors:  Barbara Fiori; Tiziana D'Inzeo; Viviana Di Florio; Flavio De Maio; Giulia De Angelis; Alessia Giaquinto; Lara Campana; Eloisa Tanzarella; Mario Tumbarello; Massimo Antonelli; Maurizio Sanguinetti; Teresa Spanu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.