Literature DB >> 3655626

Edinburgh breast education campaign on breast cancer and breast self-examination: was it worth while?

M M Roberts1, S E Robinson, K French, A Proudfoot, H Talbot, R A Elton.   

Abstract

A health education campaign was carried out at the start of a large trial of screening for breast cancer in Edinburgh. After preliminary studies the campaign concentrated on talks to small groups of women by specially trained health visitors. Over a year, 12,000 women attended. Systematic evaluation after 12 months showed that selected women who heard the talks were more knowledgeable about breast cancer, and a random sample of women in Edinburgh had a small but significant improvement in knowledge compared with women in Aberdeen. However, the random sample did not report an increase in the practice of breast self-examination (BSE) and there was no increase in workload for general practitioners. It is suggested that BSE is more likely to be accepted if combined with a physical examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3655626      PMCID: PMC1052557          DOI: 10.1136/jech.40.4.338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  10 in total

1.  'Don't take a chance': a public campaign to encourage the early reporting of breast symptoms.

Authors:  P Christmas; S Nichols
Journal:  Health Educ J       Date:  1982

2.  Are public health education campaigns worth while?

Authors:  B T Williams
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-01-21

3.  Choice or chance: further evidence on ideas of illness and responsibility for health.

Authors:  R Pill; N C Stott
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Older women's attitudes towards breast disease, self examination, and screening facilities: implications for communication.

Authors:  D S Leathar; M M Roberts
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-03-02

5.  Breast cancer and breast self-examination: what do Scottish women know?

Authors:  M M Roberts; K French; J Duffy
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Does a booklet on breast self-examination improve subsequent detection rates?

Authors:  J Turner; R Blaney; D Roy; W Odling-Smee; G Irwin; G Mackenzie
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-08-11       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Breast cancer: views of general practitioners on its detection and treatment.

Authors:  A Kalache; M Roberts; I Stratton
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1984-05

8.  The effects of breast self-examination in a population-based cancer registry. A report of differences in extent of disease.

Authors:  E M Smith; T L Burns
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Breast self-examination: clinical results from a population-based prospective study.

Authors:  J Philip; W G Harris; C Flaherty; C A Joslin; J H Rustage; D P Wijesinghe
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The Edinburgh randomised trial of screening for breast cancer: description of method.

Authors:  M M Roberts; F E Alexander; T J Anderson; A P Forrest; W Hepburn; A Huggins; A E Kirkpatrick; J Lamb; W Lutz; B B Muir
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Breast self-examination and survival from breast cancer: a prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  A Auvinen; L Elovainio; M Hakama
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.