Literature DB >> 6723669

Validity in diagnosing osteoporosis. Observer variation in interpreting spinal radiographs.

G F Jensen, P McNair, J Boesen, V Hegedüs.   

Abstract

Observer variation in interpreting radiograph of the spine in 70-year-old Danish women has been examined. The women joined a general health investigation as part of an epidemiologic screening for osteoporosis. Two experienced radiologists examined independently 280 sets of lateral radiographs of the spine to disclose fractures. The radiographs were examined four times, each examined at two different occasions by each radiologist. Overall intra-observer agreement was 88% and 87% when asked for presence or absence of fractures, irrespective of fracture localization. When accidental occurrence of agreement was taken into account (kappa analysis) intra-observer variation was reduced to 64% and 62%. The overall inter-observer agreement was 75%, but reduced to 47% when accidental occurrence of agreement was noted. Kappa analysis in testing observer variation indicates that a considerable part of agreement can be ascribed to chance alone. This seriously questions the hitherto used definition of osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6723669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  11 in total

1.  [The reliability of radiologic findings for differential diagnosis of vertebral osteoporosis].

Authors:  H Raspe; A Raspe; M Holzmann; G Leidig; C Scheidt-Nave; D Felsenberg; D Banzer; C Matthis
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-03-15

Review 2.  Identification of vertebral fractures: an update.

Authors:  L Ferrar; G Jiang; J Adams; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Intra- and interobserver variability of Kleerekoper's method in vertebral fracture assessment.

Authors:  Nese Olmez; Taciser Kaya; Rezzan Gunaydin; Berna Dirim Vidinli; Nezahat Erdogan; Asuman Memis
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Comparison of semiquantitative and quantitative techniques for the assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures.

Authors:  C Y Wu; J Li; M Jergas; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis research.

Authors:  H K Genant; M Jergas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Comparison of methods for the visual identification of prevalent vertebral fracture in osteoporosis.

Authors:  G Jiang; R Eastell; N A Barrington; L Ferrar
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Observer variability in assessment of angiographic vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Authors:  V Eskesen; A Karle; A Kruse; C Kruse-Larsen; J Praestholm; K Schmidt
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Ability of vertebral dimensions from a single radiograph to identify fractures.

Authors:  P D Ross; J W Davis; R S Epstein; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 9.  Update on vertebral fractures in pituitary diseases: from research to clinical practice.

Authors:  Flaminia Carrone; Salvatore Ariano; Sara Piccini; Davide Milani; Marco Mirani; Luca Balzarini; Andrea Gerardo Lania; Gherardo Mazziotti
Journal:  Hormones (Athens)       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.885

Review 10.  Imaging of vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Ananya Panda; Chandan J Das; Udismita Baruah
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.