Literature DB >> 23120699

Objective acoustic analysis of voice improvement after phonosurgery.

Piyush Verma1, Manisha Pal, Anoop Raj.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate voice improvement after phonosurgery by objective acoustic analysis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted in Maulana Azad Medical college New Delhi from December 2002 to 2008. In this study 100 subjects were included comprising of all age groups and either sex. All these patients with organic voice disorder underwent speech analysis using VAUGMI speech analysis program before and after phonosurgery. RESULT: All the parameter of voice analysis were deranged before the treatment but after surgery all the parameters should improvement most significant change was seen in the jitter.
CONCLUSION: After doing this study we found that the analysis of hoarse voice using various parameters of acoustic analysis like fundamental frequency, harmonics to noise ratio, jitter, shimmer, S/z ratio helped us in identifying the degree of hoarseness and the severity related to it. Some parameters like jitter and shimmer were able to detect the component of hoarseness in perceptually normal voice and thus patient was helped by doing surgery and voice therapy at the appropriate time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Organic voice disorder; Phonosurgery; Voice analysis

Year:  2010        PMID: 23120699      PMCID: PMC3450300          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-010-0024-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  15 in total

1.  A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. Guideline elaborated by the Committee on Phoniatrics of the European Laryngological Society (ELS).

Authors:  P H Dejonckere; P Bradley; P Clemente; G Cornut; L Crevier-Buchman; G Friedrich; P Van De Heyning; M Remacle; V Woisard
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Objective aerodynamic and acoustic measurement of voice improvement after phonosurgery.

Authors:  A Giovanni; J Revis; J M Triglia
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  [Aspects of voice quality quantification].

Authors:  E Fresnel; A J Fourcin
Journal:  Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord)       Date:  2000

4.  [Computer use in voice analysis: clinical applications].

Authors:  A Nieto; A J del Palacio; F J Lorenzo; A Vegas; I Cobeta
Journal:  Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug

5.  [Harmonic/noise ratio and spectrographic analysis in vocal abuse pathology].

Authors:  A Nieto; I Cobeta; F J Gamboa; J Montojo; A Vegas
Journal:  Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct

6.  Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements.

Authors:  P H Dejonckere; M Remacle; E Fresnel-Elbaz; V Woisard; L Crevier-Buchman; B Millet
Journal:  Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord)       Date:  1996

7.  Validation of an instrument to measure voice-related quality of life (V-RQOL).

Authors:  N D Hogikyan; G Sethuraman
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Harmonics-to-noise ratio and psychophysical measurement of the degree of hoarseness.

Authors:  E Yumoto; Y Sasaki; H Okamura
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1984-03

9.  Development and validation of the voice handicap index-10.

Authors:  Clark A Rosen; Annie S Lee; Jamie Osborne; Thomas Zullo; Thomas Murry
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  [S/z ratio in glottic closure defects].

Authors:  F J Gamboa; A Nieto; A J del Palacio; T Rivera; I Cobeta
Journal:  Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.