Literature DB >> 670550

Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids.

R Plomp.   

Abstract

The aim of this article is to promote a better understanding of hearing impairment as a communicative handicap, primarily in noisy environments, and to explain by means of a quantitative model the essentially limited applicability of hearing aids. After data on the prevalence of hearing impairment and of auditory handicap have been reviewed, it is explained that every hearing loss for speech can be interpreted as the sum of a loss class A (attenuation), characterized by a reduction of the levels of both speech signal and noise, and a loss D (distortion), comparable with a decrease in speech-to-noise ratio. On the average, the hearing loss of class D (hearing loss in noise) appears to be about one-third (in decibels) of the total hearing loss (A + D, hearing loss in quiet). A hearing aid can compensate for class-A-hearing losses, giving difficulties primarily in quiet, but not for class-D hearing losses, giving difficulties primarily in noise. The latter class represents the first stage of auditory handicap, beginning at an average hearing loss of about 24 dB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 670550     DOI: 10.1121/1.381753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  67 in total

1.  Hearing aid satisfaction: what does research from the past 20 years say?

Authors:  Lena L N Wong; Louise Hickson; Bradley McPherson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2003

Review 2.  Screening for hearing impairment in the elderly: rationale and strategy.

Authors:  C D Mulrow; M J Lichtenstein
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  [The age effect in evaluation of hearing aid benefits by speech audiometry].

Authors:  A Müller; T Hocke; U Hoppe; P Mir-Salim
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 4.  Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: implications for hearing aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Gurjit Singh
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-03

5.  A Comparative Study of Auditory-Perceptual Speech Measures for the Early Detection of Mild Speech Impairments.

Authors:  Mili Kuruvilla-Dugdale; Katie Threlkeld; Mary Salazar; Gwen Nolan; Lindsey Heidrick
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 1.761

6.  Behavioral measures of signal recognition thresholds in frogs in the presence and absence of chorus-shaped noise.

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Joshua J Schwartz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening.

Authors:  Jayne B Ahlstrom; Amy R Horwitz; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Examination of the validity of auditory traits and tests.

Authors:  G A Flamme
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2001-09

9.  Effects of Expanding Envelope Fluctuations on Consonant Perception in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.

Authors:  Alan Wiinberg; Johannes Zaar; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 10.  Auditory reality and self-assessment of hearing.

Authors:  William Noble
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.