Literature DB >> 8092370

The relationship of prenatal care and pregnancy complications to birthweight in Winnipeg, Canada.

C A Mustard1, N P Roos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Prenatal care is commonly understood to have a beneficial impact on birthweight. This study describes socioeconomic differences in utilization of prenatal medical care and birthweight in a population with universal health insurance.
METHODS: Measures of prenatal care utilization, incidence of pregnancy complications, and birthweight were obtained from physician reimbursement claims and hospital separation abstracts for 12,646 pregnant women. Maternal socioeconomic status was derived from small-area census data.
RESULTS: Infants born to women in the poorest income quintile had lower birthweights than infants born to wealthier women. Much of the difference was associated with a higher prevalence of complications, smoking, unmarried status, and inadequate prenatal care among low-income women. The difference in birthweight between adequate and less than adequate care groups was small, and the benefit associated with prenatal care was no greater among women with pregnancy complications.
CONCLUSIONS: The lower utilization of prenatal care by poorer women accounted for a small proportion of the difference in birthweight. Socioeconomic differences in birthweight are primarily attributable to factors not directly influenced by early prenatal medical care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8092370      PMCID: PMC1615180          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.84.9.1450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  43 in total

1.  Medicaid and prenatal care. Necessary but not sufficient.

Authors:  B Guyer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-11-07       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Modeling heart disease mortality with census tract rates and social class mixtures.

Authors:  E E Logue; D Jarjoura
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Effects of Medicaid eligibility expansion on prenatal care and pregnancy outcome in Tennessee.

Authors:  J M Piper; W A Ray; M R Griffin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-11-07       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Prenatal care evaluation and cohort analyses.

Authors:  J Tyson; D Guzick; C R Rosenfeld; R Lasky; N Gant; J Jiminez; S Heartwell
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Social support and pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  A Oakley; L Rajan; A Grant
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1990-02

6.  Small-area variation in hospital discharge rates. Do socioeconomic variables matter?

Authors:  C G McLaughlin; D P Normolle; R A Wolfe; L F McMahon; J R Griffith
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 7.  The prevention of preterm birth: unresolved problems and work in progress.

Authors:  J Lumley
Journal:  Aust Paediatr J       Date:  1988-04

8.  Barriers to implementation of a prenatal care program for low income women.

Authors:  C L Miller; L H Margolis; B Schwethelm; S Smith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Effect of parents' occupational exposures on risk of stillbirth, preterm delivery, and small-for-gestational-age infants.

Authors:  D A Savitz; E A Whelan; R C Kleckner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  The differential effect of prenatal care on the incidence of low birth weight among blacks and whites in a prepaid health care plan.

Authors:  J L Murray; M Bernfield
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-11-24       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  24 in total

1.  Trends and variations in perinatal mortality and low birthweight: the contribution of socio-economic factors.

Authors:  I N Luginaah; K S Lee; T J Abernathy; D Sheehan; G Webster
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec

2.  Prenatal care use among selected Asian American groups.

Authors:  S M Yu; G R Alexander; R Schwalberg; M D Kogan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Does smoking by pregnant women influence IQ, birth weight, and developmental disabilities in their infants? A methodological review and multivariate analysis.

Authors:  M C Ramsay; C R Reynolds
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.444

4.  Trends in prenatal care use and low birthweight in southeast Brazil.

Authors:  Marcelo Z Goldani; Marco A Barbieri; Antonio A M Silva; Heloisa Bettiol
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  The Manitoba Healthy Baby Prenatal Benefit Program: who is participating?

Authors:  Marni D Brownell; Anne Guevremont; Wendy Au; Monica Sirski
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb

6.  Prenatal care among mothers involved with child protection services in Manitoba: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Wall-Wieler; Kathleen Kenny; Janelle Lee; Kellie Thiessen; Margaret Morris; Leslie L Roos
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  The effect of expanding Medicaid prenatal services on birth outcomes.

Authors:  L M Baldwin; E H Larson; F A Connell; D Nordlund; K C Cain; M L Cawthon; P Byrns; R A Rosenblatt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Obstetric care and payment source: do low-risk Medicaid women get less care?

Authors:  S Dobie; L G Hart; M Fordyce; C H Andrilla; R A Rosenblatt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Birth outcomes and the effectiveness of prenatal care.

Authors:  G G Liu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Does universal comprehensive insurance encourage unnecessary use? Evidence from Manitoba says "no".

Authors:  Noralou P Roos; Evelyn Forget; Randy Walld; Leonard MacWilliam
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-01-20       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.