Literature DB >> 10093170

Filter ventilation and nicotine content of tobacco in cigarettes from Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

L T Kozlowski1, N Y Mehta, C T Sweeney, S S Schwartz, G P Vogler, M J Jarvis, R J West.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose was to determine filter ventilation and the nicotine content of tobacco and their contribution to machine-smoked yields of cigarettes from the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom.
METHODS: Ninety-two brands of cigarettes (32 American, 23 Canadian, and 37 British brands) were purchased at retail outlets in State College, Pennsylvania, United States, Toronto, Canada, and London, United Kingdom. A FIDUS FDT filter ventilation tester measured the percentage air-dilution from filter vents. High-pressure, liquid chromatography was used to measure the nicotine content of tobacco. Regression techniques were used to examine the contributions of tobacco nicotine content and filter ventilation to machine-smoked yields of tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide (CO).
RESULTS: Ninety-four per cent of the American brands, 91% of the Canadian brands, and 79% of British brands were ventilated. The total nicotine content of tobacco and percent nicotine (by weight of tobacco) averaged 10.2 mg (standard error of the mean (SEM) 0.25, range: 7.2 to 13.4) and 1.5% (SEM 0.03, range 1.2 to 2) in the United States, 13.5 mg (SEM 0.49, range: 8.0 to 18.3) and 1.8% (SEM 0.06, range: 1.0 to 2.4) in Canada, 12.5 mg (SEM 0.33, range: 9 to 17.5) and 1.7% (SEM 0.04, range: 1.3 to 2.4) in the United Kingdom. Multiple regression analyses showed that ventilation was by far the largest factor influencing machine-smoked yields of tar, nicotine, and CO.
CONCLUSION: Filter ventilation appears to be the predominant method for reducing machine-smoked yields of tar, nicotine, and CO in three countries. However, some brands contain about twice as much nicotine (total content or percent nicotine) as do others, indicating that tobacco types or blends and tobacco castings can be used to manipulate nicotine content and nicotine delivery of cigarettes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10093170      PMCID: PMC1751464          DOI: 10.1136/tc.7.4.369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  15 in total

1.  Respiratory effects of lowering tar and nicotine levels of cigarettes smoked by young male middle tar smokers. II. Results of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  C H Withey; A O Papacosta; A V Swan; B A Fitzsimons; G A Ellard; P G Burney; J R Colley; W W Holland
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Prevalence of the misuse of ultra-low-tar cigarettes by blocking filter vents.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; M A Pope; J E Lux
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Changes in overwrap and butt length of American filter cigarettes. An influence on reported tar yields.

Authors:  N E Grunberg; D E Morse; V A Maycock; L T Kozlowski
Journal:  N Y State J Med       Date:  1985-07

4.  A comparison of the yields of tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide of 36 brands of Canadian cigarettes tested under three conditions.

Authors:  W S Rickert; J C Robinson; J C Young; N E Collishaw; D F Bray
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Have tar and nicotine yields of cigarettes changed?

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; W S Rickert; J C Robinson; N E Grunberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-09-26       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Tar and nicotine delivery of cigarettes. What a difference a puff makes.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1981-01-09       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The misuse of 'less-hazardous' cigarettes and its detection: hole-blocking of ventilated filters.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; R C Frecker; V Khouw; M A Pope
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Self-selected blocking of vents on low-yield cigarettes.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; T F Heatherton; R C Frecker; H E Nolte
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.533

9.  Smokers of low-yield cigarettes do not consume less nicotine.

Authors:  N L Benowitz; S M Hall; R I Herning; P Jacob; R T Jones; A L Osman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-07-21       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Reduction of tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide intake in low tar smokers.

Authors:  M A Russell; M J Jarvis; C Feyerabend; Y Saloojee
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.710

View more
  51 in total

Review 1.  Cigarette filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; R J O'Connor
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Determination of tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide yields in the mainstream smoke of selected international cigarettes.

Authors:  A M Calafat; G M Polzin; J Saylor; P Richter; D L Ashley; C H Watson
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Threshold of biologic responses of the small airway epithelium to low levels of tobacco smoke.

Authors:  Yael Strulovici-Barel; Larsson Omberg; Michael O'Mahony; Cynthia Gordon; Charleen Hollmann; Ann E Tilley; Jacqueline Salit; Jason Mezey; Ben-Gary Harvey; Ronald G Crystal
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Cigarette characteristic and emission variations across high-, middle- and low-income countries.

Authors:  R J O'Connor; K J Wilkins; R V Caruso; K M Cummings; L T Kozlowski
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 2.427

5.  How did UK cigarette makers reduce tar to 10 mg or less?

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Gary A Giovino; Ann McNeill; Lynn T Kozlowski
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-02-04

6.  Maximum yields might improve public health--if filter vents were banned: a lesson from the history of vented filters.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; R J O'Connor; G A Giovino; C A Whetzel; J Pauly; K M Cummings
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Variation in Free Radical Yields from U.S. Marketed Cigarettes.

Authors:  Reema Goel; Zachary Bitzer; Samantha M Reilly; Neil Trushin; Jonathan Foulds; Joshua Muscat; Jason Liao; Ryan J Elias; John P Richie
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.739

8.  The Impact of Smoking Very Low Nicotine Content Cigarettes on Alcohol Use.

Authors:  Sarah S Dermody; Jennifer W Tidey; Rachel L Denlinger; Lauren R Pacek; Mustafa al'Absi; David J Drobes; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Ryan Vandrey; Eric C Donny
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 9.  Reconciling human smoking behavior and machine smoking patterns: implications for understanding smoking behavior and the impact on laboratory studies.

Authors:  Catalin Marian; Richard J O'Connor; Mirjana V Djordjevic; Vaughan W Rees; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 10.  Surveillance methods for identifying, characterizing, and monitoring tobacco products: potential reduced exposure products as an example.

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Vaughan W Rees; Gregory N Connolly; Kaila J Norton; David Sweanor; Mark Parascandola; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.