Literature DB >> 6654550

Effects of shoe cushioning upon ground reaction forces in running.

T E Clarke, E C Frederick, L B Cooper.   

Abstract

To determine the effects of widely varying amounts of cushioning upon vertical force (VF) parameters, ten male subjects, (mean weight = 68.0 kg) ran at a speed of 4.5 m . s-1 (6 min/mile pace) and contacted a Kistler force platform. Two shoes were tested: a hard one and a softer shoe that had 50% more cushioning as measured by an instrumented impact tester. Five right footfalls were collected for each shoe on each subject during which the ground reaction forces were sampled at 500 HZ using a PDP 11/34 minicomputer. Eight parameters from the VF data obtained for each trial were selected for analysis and compared statistically using a paired difference t test. It was found [force magnitudes expressed in multiples of body weight (BW)] that the time to the vertical force impact peak (VFIP) was significantly longer (hard = 22.5 ms, soft = 26.6 ms) in the soft shoe; however, no differences were seen in the magnitudes (hard = 2.30 BW, soft = 2.34 BW). The minimum after the VFIP was also significantly delayed in the soft shoe (hard = 33.8 ms, soft = 37.9 ms) and was significantly greater in the soft shoe (hard = 1.46 BW, soft = 1.90 BW). The peak VF propulsive force occurred statistically at the same time in both shoes (hard = 85.7 ms, soft = 84.0 ms), but was significantly greater in the soft shoe (hard = 2.73 BW, soft = 2.83 BW).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6654550     DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1026043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  15 in total

1.  Anthropometric, gait and strength characteristics of kenyan distance runners.

Authors:  Pui W Kong; Hendrik de Heer
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 2.  Athletic footwear and chronic overloading. A brief review.

Authors:  S E Robbins; G J Gouw
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Shock-absorbing effects of various padding conditions in improving efficacy of wrist guards.

Authors:  Il-Kyu Hwang; Kyu-Jung Kim
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  The Influence of a Bout of Exertion on Novice Barefoot Running Dynamics.

Authors:  Rami Hashish; Sachithra D Samarawickrame; Lucinda Baker; George J Salem
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Kinematic and kinetic parameters associated with running in different shoes.

Authors:  P J McNair; R N Marshall
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Ground reaction force differences between running shoes, racing flats, and distance spikes in runners.

Authors:  Suzanna Logan; Ian Hunter; J T J Ty Hopkins; J Brent Feland; Allen C Parcell
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Firm insoles effectively reduce hemolysis in runners during long distance running - a comparative study.

Authors:  Kamal Janakiraman; Shweta Shenoy; Jaspal Singh Sandhu
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol       Date:  2011-06-09

8.  Increased vertical impact forces and altered running mechanics with softer midsole shoes.

Authors:  Jennifer Baltich; Christian Maurer; Benno M Nigg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Preferred Barefoot Step Frequency is Influenced by Factors Beyond Minimizing Metabolic Rate.

Authors:  Matthew B Yandell; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Changes in Impact Signals and Muscle Activity in Response to Different Shoe and Landing Conditions.

Authors:  Xi Wang; Shen Zhang; Weijie Fu
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2017-03-12       Impact factor: 2.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.