Literature DB >> 24149399

Ground reaction force differences between running shoes, racing flats, and distance spikes in runners.

Suzanna Logan1, Ian Hunter, J T J Ty Hopkins, J Brent Feland, Allen C Parcell.   

Abstract

Various shoes are worn by distance runners throughout a training season. This study measured the differences in ground reaction forces between running shoes, racing flats, and distance spikes in order to provide information about the potential effects of footwear on injury risk in highly competitive runners. Ten male and ten female intercollegiate distance runners ran across a force plate at 6.7 m·s(-1) (for males) and 5.7 m·s(-1) (for females) in each of the three types of shoes. To control for differences in foot strike, only subjects who exhibited a heel strike were included in the data analysis. Two repeated-measures ANOVAs with Tukey's post-hoc tests (p < 0.05) were used to detect differences in shoe types among males and females. For the males, loading rate, peak vertical impact force and peak braking forces were significantly greater in flats and spikes compared to running shoes. Vertical stiffness in spikes was also significantly greater than in running shoes. Females had significantly shorter stance times and greater maximum propulsion forces in racing flats compared to running shoes. Changing footwear between the shoes used in this study alters the loads placed on the body. Care should be taken as athletes enter different phases of training where different footwear is required. Injury risk may be increased since the body may not be accustomed to the differences in force, stance time, and vertical stiffness. Key pointsTo determine the differences in ground reaction forces between regular running shoes and competitive footwear, force plate data was obtained from 10 males (6.7 m·s(-1)) and 10 females (5.7 m·s(-1)) for each of three shoe types.Data from men and women were analyzed in two separate groups, and significant differences were found for various GRF components between the three types of shoes.The significant increases in GRF components in competitive footwear suggest that the body must deal with greater impact forces in these shoes than in running shoes at the same running speed.The results from this study warrant the recommendation that runners transition gradually from periods when most or all of their training is done in running shoes to more competitive seasons when more of their training is done in racing flats and spikes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Footwear; impact; track

Year:  2010        PMID: 24149399      PMCID: PMC3737977     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  33 in total

1.  The effect of neuromuscular training on the incidence of knee injury in female athletes. A prospective study.

Authors:  T E Hewett; T N Lindenfeld; J V Riccobene; F R Noyes
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  The effect of speed on leg stiffness and joint kinetics in human running.

Authors:  A Arampatzis; G P Brüggemann; V Metzler
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Relationship between vertical ground reaction force and speed during walking, slow jogging, and running.

Authors:  T S Keller; A M Weisberger; J L Ray; S S Hasan; R G Shiavi; D M Spengler
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  A new approach to modeling vertical stiffness in heel-toe distance runners.

Authors:  Iain Hunter
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Foot strike patterns of runners at the 15-km point during an elite-level half marathon.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hasegawa; Takeshi Yamauchi; William J Kraemer
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Evaluation of lower extremity overuse injury potential in runners.

Authors:  A Hreljac; R N Marshall; P A Hume
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Dominant role of interface over knee angle for cushioning impact loading and regulating initial leg stiffness.

Authors:  M A Lafortune; E M Hennig; M J Lake
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Ground reaction forces in running: a reexamination.

Authors:  C F Munro; D I Miller; A J Fuglevand
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Effects of shoe cushioning upon ground reaction forces in running.

Authors:  T E Clarke; E C Frederick; L B Cooper
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.118

10.  Ground reaction forces, bone characteristics, and tibial stress fracture in male runners.

Authors:  K Crossley; K L Bennell; T Wrigley; B W Oakes
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Stiffness as a Risk Factor for Achilles Tendon Injury in Running Athletes.

Authors:  Anna V Lorimer; Patria A Hume
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Intra-Rater Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change of Vertical Ground Reaction Force Measurement during Gait and Half-Squat Tasks on Healthy Male Adults.

Authors:  Fariza Zainudin Fairus; Leonard Henry Joseph; Baharudin Omar; Johan Ahmad; Riza Sulaiman
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2016-03

3.  Firm insoles effectively reduce hemolysis in runners during long distance running - a comparative study.

Authors:  Kamal Janakiraman; Shweta Shenoy; Jaspal Singh Sandhu
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol       Date:  2011-06-09

4.  Effect of Footwear Modifications on Oscillations at the Achilles Tendon during Running on a Treadmill and Over Ground: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Ilka Meinert; Niklas Brown; Wilfried Alt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Shoe cushioning, body mass and running biomechanics as risk factors for running injury: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Laurent Malisoux; Nicolas Delattre; Axel Urhausen; Daniel Theisen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Principal Component Analysis of the Running Ground Reaction Forces With Different Speeds.

Authors:  Lin Yu; Qichang Mei; Liangliang Xiang; Wei Liu; Nur Ikhwan Mohamad; Bíró István; Justin Fernandez; Yaodong Gu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-03-25

7.  Implications of sample size and acquired number of steps to investigate running biomechanics.

Authors:  Anderson Souza Oliveira; Cristina Ioana Pirscoveanu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A Single Sacral-Mounted Inertial Measurement Unit to Estimate Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force, Contact Time, and Flight Time in Running.

Authors:  Aurélien Patoz; Thibault Lussiana; Bastiaan Breine; Cyrille Gindre; Davide Malatesta
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Validation of the RunScribe inertial measurement unit for walking gait measurement.

Authors:  Max Lewin; Carina Price; Christopher Nester
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 3.752

10.  Effects of Surface Inclination on the Vertical Loading Rates and Landing Pattern during the First Attempt of Barefoot Running in Habitual Shod Runners.

Authors:  W An; M J Rainbow; R T H Cheung
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.