Literature DB >> 24497817

Shock-absorbing effects of various padding conditions in improving efficacy of wrist guards.

Il-Kyu Hwang1, Kyu-Jung Kim2.   

Abstract

The use of wrist guards has limited efficacy in preventing wrist injuries during falling in many sports activities. The objectives of this study were to measure the ground reaction force of the hand under simulated impact of the forearm and hand complex with different padding conditions of wrist guards and to analyze their impact force attenuation and maximum energy absorption for improved functional efficiency. A total of 15 subjects, wearing a commercial wrist guard, participated in a cable-released hand impact experiment to test four different conditions on the volar aspect of the hand, which include a wrist guard without a volar splint (bare hand), with a volar splint (normal use), with a volar splint and additional viscoelastic polymeric padding, and a volar splint and additional air cell padding. The ground reaction force and acceleration of the hand were measured using a force platform mounted on an anti-vibration table and a miniature accelerometer, respectively. Additional padding on the bare hand could substantially improve the maximum energy absorption by more than 39%, with no differences with each other. However, only the air cell padding could simultaneously improve the impact force attenuation by 32% compared with the bare hand impact without compromising the maximum energy absorption. It is recommended that common wrist guard design should provide more compliant padding in the volar aspect to improve the impact force attenuation through optimal material selection and design. Key PointsTHE CONTROVERSIAL EFFICACY OF WRIST GUARDS IN PREVENTING WRIST INJURIES DURING FALLING WAS TESTED THROUGH INVESTIGATION OF THEIR IMPACT FORCE ATTENUATION AND MAXIMUM ENERGY ABSORPTION FROM THE MEASURED GROUND REACTION FORCE OF THE HAND UNDER SIMULATED IMPACT OF THE FOREARM AND HAND COMPLEX WITH FOUR DIFFERENT PADDING CONDITIONS OF WRIST GUARDS: a wrist guard without a volar splint (bare hand), with a volar splint (normal use), with a volar splint and additional viscoelastic polymeric padding, and a volar splint and additional air cell padding.In general, padding on the bare hand could improve the maximum energy absorption by more than 39%, while only the air cell padding could simultaneously attenuate the peak impact force by 32% without compromising the maximum energy absorption.Common wrist guard design requires more compliant padding in the volar aspect to improve the impact force attenuation, which should be done through optimal material selection and design.

Keywords:  Accidental falls direction; fractures; prevention; wrist injuries

Year:  2004        PMID: 24497817      PMCID: PMC3896110     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  30 in total

1.  The effect of wrist guards on bone strain in the distal forearm.

Authors:  M P Staebler; D C Moore; E Akelman; A P Weiss; P D Fadale; J J Crisco
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  The efficacy of wrist protectors in preventing snowboarding injuries.

Authors:  R Rønning; I Rønning; T Gerner; L Engebretsen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Force reduction by an external hip protector on the human hip after falls.

Authors:  Stanley L Wiener; Gunnar B J Andersson; Lloyd M Nyhus; Jerry Czech
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Age and sex influences on fall characteristics.

Authors:  T W O'Neill; J Varlow; A J Silman; J Reeve; D M Reid; C Todd; A D Woolf
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Do wrist guards protect against fractures?

Authors:  L M Lewis; O C West; J Standeven; H E Jarvis
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  Wrist guards in in-line and conventional roller-skating injuries.

Authors:  A L Chong; P S Sunner; S R Deshpande
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1995-04-17       Impact factor: 7.738

7.  Effects of shoe cushioning upon ground reaction forces in running.

Authors:  T E Clarke; E C Frederick; L B Cooper
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.118

8.  Prevention of hip fracture in elderly people with use of a hip protector.

Authors:  P Kannus; J Parkkari; S Niemi; M Pasanen; M Palvanen; M Järvinen; I Vuori
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-11-23       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Shock absorbency of factors in the shoe/heel interaction--with special focus on role of the heel pad.

Authors:  U Jørgensen; F Bojsen-Møller
Journal:  Foot Ankle       Date:  1989-06

10.  Surface stiffness affects impact force during a fall on the outstretched hand.

Authors:  S N Robinovitch; J Chiu
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.