Literature DB >> 7894957

Kinematic and kinetic parameters associated with running in different shoes.

P J McNair1, R N Marshall.   

Abstract

The characteristics of the midsole were examined in four pairs of running shoes by a materials test. The variables of interest were the peak acceleration, time to peak acceleration and the kinetic energy absorbed. Ten subjects then ran at a recreational jogging pace (3.5 ms-1) barefoot and in the shoes. An accelerometer secured to the lower tibia was used to measure the peak acceleration and time to peak acceleration associated with footstrike. Subjects were also videoed and a kinematic analysis was undertaken at the knee and ankle joints. The results from the materials test showed that the shoes differed in their midsole characteristics, however, no significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed in the peak acceleration and time to peak acceleration during running in shoes. These variables were significantly greater in the barefoot running condition (P < 0.05), as compared with running in shoes. Small and subtle kinematic differences were observed between the barefoot and shoe conditions. It appears that the differences observed between the shoes in the materials test were not sufficient to elicit the kinematic changes observed between the barefoot and shoe conditions. It is suggested that runners operate within a 'kinetic bandwidth' when responding to impact stresses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7894957      PMCID: PMC1332086          DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.28.4.256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  7 in total

Review 1.  The validity and relevance of tests used for the assessment of sports surfaces.

Authors:  B M Nigg
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  An in vitro simulation study of impulsive force transmission along the lower skeletal extremity.

Authors:  M L Chu; S Yazdani-Ardakani; I A Gradisar; M J Askew
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Effects of shoe cushioning upon ground reaction forces in running.

Authors:  T E Clarke; E C Frederick; L B Cooper
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.118

4.  Skeletal transients on heel strike in normal walking with different footwear.

Authors:  L H Light; G E McLellan; L Klenerman
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Wave attenuation in skeletons of young healthy persons.

Authors:  J Wosk; A Voloshin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Management of pain beneath the heel and Achilles tendonitis with visco-elastic heel inserts.

Authors:  G E MacLellan; B Vyvyan
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 13.800

7.  Force wave transmission through the human locomotor system.

Authors:  A Voloshin; J Wosk; M Brull
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 2.097

  7 in total
  12 in total

1.  Kinematic and electromyography analysis of submaximal differences running on a firm surface compared with soft, dry sand.

Authors:  Hugh C Pinnington; David G Lloyd; Thor F Besier; Brian Dawson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  The biomechanical differences between barefoot and shod distance running: a systematic review and preliminary meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan P L Hall; Christian Barton; Paul Remy Jones; Dylan Morrissey
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Walking and running on treadmill: the standard criteria for kinematics studies.

Authors:  Johnny Padulo; Karim Chamari; Luca Paolo Ardigò
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2014-07-14

4.  Lower limb muscle activity during forefoot and rearfoot strike running techniques.

Authors:  Lindsey L Landreneau; Kayla Watts; Jill E Heitzman; W Lee Childers
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-12

5.  Acute differences in foot strike and spatiotemporal variables for shod, barefoot or minimalist male runners.

Authors:  Ciara McCallion; Bernard Donne; Neil Fleming; Brian Blanksby
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 6.  Iliotibial band syndrome in runners: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maarten P van der Worp; Nick van der Horst; Anton de Wijer; Frank J G Backx; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Wearables for Running Gait Analysis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rachel Mason; Liam T Pearson; Gillian Barry; Fraser Young; Oisin Lennon; Alan Godfrey; Samuel Stuart
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 11.928

Review 8.  The Use of Wearable Sensors for Preventing, Assessing, and Informing Recovery from Sport-Related Musculoskeletal Injuries: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ezio Preatoni; Elena Bergamini; Silvia Fantozzi; Lucie I Giraud; Amaranta S Orejel Bustos; Giuseppe Vannozzi; Valentina Camomilla
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  The Effect of the Accelerometer Operating Range on Biomechanical Parameters: Stride Length, Velocity, and Peak Tibial Acceleration during Running.

Authors:  Christian Mitschke; Pierre Kiesewetter; Thomas L Milani
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Immediate effects of EVA midsole resilience and upper shoe structure on running biomechanics: a machine learning approach.

Authors:  Andrea N Onodera; Isabel Cn Sacco; Wilson P Gavião Neto; Maria Isabel Roveri; Wagner R Oliveira
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.