Literature DB >> 20013001

Preliminary study: reliability of the spinal wheel. A novel device to measure spinal postures applied to sitting and standing.

Liba Sheeran1, Valerie Sparkes, Monica Busse, Robert van Deursen.   

Abstract

Postural re-education is an integral part of physiotherapy management in patients with back pain. Although the link between posture and back pain is largely unknown, postural re-education is performed on the premise of optimizing spinal alignment to minimize stresses on the passive structures of the spine, to facilitate optimal muscular support and thus to prevent possible damage and further pain. A reliable and clinically meaningful measurement of spinal postures to monitor such interventions remains challenging. This study evaluated within-day (intra-tester, inter-tester) and between-day (test-retest) reliability of a novel spinal wheel device measuring thoracic and lumbar postures during sitting and standing. 17 healthy volunteers (age 39.5 +/- 5.4, BMI 25 +/- 9.2; 9 males) were measured three times, by three testers, on two separate occasions (1 week apart). The angular change between C7 and T12 and between T12 and S1 provided thoracic and lumbar curvatures, respectively. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals and typical error were calculated. Excellent reliability was demonstrated with intra-tester ICCs between 0.947 and 0.980 and typical error between 1.7 degrees and 3.7 degrees and inter-tester ICCs between 0.949 and 0.986 and typical error between 2.0 degrees and 4.7 degrees. Test-retest reliability was high with ICCs 0.719-0.908 and typical error between 4.0 degrees and 7.4 degrees. In conclusion, the spinal wheel demonstrated excellent within-day and high between-day reliability. The device may be used in conjunction with 2D camcorder to provide clinically useful visual evaluation of postures for assessment, intervention monitoring, and feedback during postural re-education.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20013001      PMCID: PMC2899977          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1241-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  68 in total

1.  A comparison of two motion analysis devices used in the measurement of lumbar spinal mobility.

Authors:  A Mannion; M Troke
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Can exercise therapy improve the outcome of microdiscectomy?

Authors:  P Dolan; K Greenfield; R J Nelson; I W Nelson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Skin movement errors in measurement of sagittal lumbar and hip angles in young and elderly subjects.

Authors:  Yi-Liang Kuo; Elizabeth A Tully; Mary P Galea
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 4.  Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine.

Authors:  G Atkinson; A M Nevill
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error.

Authors:  R T Morrissy; G S Goldsmith; E C Hall; D Kehl; G H Cowie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Spinal range of motion. Accuracy and sources of error with inclinometric measurement.

Authors:  T G Mayer; G Kondraske; S B Beals; R J Gatchel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Correlation between radiographic and clinical measurement of lumbar spine movement.

Authors:  I Portek; M J Pearcy; G P Reader; A G Mowat
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1983-11

8.  Differences in repositioning error among patients with low back pain compared with control subjects.

Authors:  K L Newcomer; E R Laskowski; B Yu; J C Johnson; K N An
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Regional assessment of joint position sense in the spine.

Authors:  A Swinkels; P Dolan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  New method for the non-invasive three-dimensional measurement of human back movement.

Authors:  M J Pearcy; R J Hindle
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.063

View more
  6 in total

1.  Intrasubject repeatability of in vivo intervertebral motion parameters using quantitative fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Alexander Breen; Rebecca Hemming; Fiona Mellor; Alan Breen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-12-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Validation of a novel spinal posture monitor: comparison with digital videofluoroscopy.

Authors:  Kieran O'Sullivan; Sabine Verschueren; Steven Pans; David Smets; Karel Dekelver; Wim Dankaerts
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  The quality of evidence of psychometric properties of three-dimensional spinal posture-measuring instruments.

Authors:  Yolandi Brink; Quinette Louw; Karen Grimmer-Somers
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Can different seating aids influence a sitting posture in healthy individuals and does gender matter?

Authors:  Liba Sheeran; Rebecca Hemming; Robert van Deursen; Valerie Sparkes
Journal:  Cogent Eng       Date:  2018-03-02

5.  A Validation Study of a Polymer Optical Fiber Sensor for Monitoring Lumbar Spine Movement.

Authors:  Wern Kam; Mary O'Keeffe; Kieran O'Sullivan; Waleed S Mohammed; Sinead O'Keeffe; Elfed Lewis; Charusluk Viphavakit
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  The Virtual-Spine Platform-Acquiring, visualizing, and analyzing individual sitting behavior.

Authors:  Stephen Jia Wang; Björn Sommer; Wenlong Cheng; Falk Schreiber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.