Literature DB >> 6632164

Readability of informed consent forms for research in a Veterans Administration medical center.

M T Baker, H A Taub.   

Abstract

This study examined the effects of federal regulations on the readability and length of consent forms used in medical research from 1975 through 1982. Materials evaluated were 49 information sheets from four sample time periods and the 1975 and 1979 revisions of the Veterans Administration consent document. Flesch readability scores were at college level for both the consent documents and information sheets from all sample time periods. Thus, consent forms always may have been too difficult for typical volunteers to comprehend. Changes in length and content of the consent documents suggest that difficulty levels actually may have increased since 1975. Efforts to protect the rights of research subjects through federal regulations have resulted in presentation of appropriate information, but little progress has been made in ensuring that the information is comprehensible, understood, and used.

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6632164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  12 in total

1.  Assessing the readability of ClinicalTrials.gov.

Authors:  Danny T Y Wu; David A Hanauer; Qiaozhu Mei; Patricia M Clark; Lawrence C An; Joshua Proulx; Qing T Zeng; V G Vinod Vydiswaran; Kevyn Collins-Thompson; Kai Zheng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  The use of multimedia in the informed consent process.

Authors:  H B Jimison; P P Sher; R Appleyard; Y LeVernois
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Research consent forms: continued unreadability and increasing length.

Authors:  M E LoVerde; A V Prochazka; R L Byyny
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Health literacy and ophthalmic patient education.

Authors:  Kelly W Muir; Paul P Lee
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 6.048

5.  A pilot study of simple interventions to improve informed consent in clinical research: feasibility, approach, and results.

Authors:  Nancy E Kass; Holly A Taylor; Joseph Ali; Kristina Hallez; Lelia Chaisson
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  Informed consent, parental awareness, and reasons for participating in a randomised controlled study.

Authors:  M van Stuijvenberg; M H Suur; S de Vos; G C Tjiang; E W Steyerberg; G Derksen-Lubsen; H A Moll
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Informed consent in clinical research with drugs in Spain: perspective of clinical trials committee members.

Authors:  R Dal-Ré
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Consent timing and experience: modifiable factors that may influence interest in clinical research.

Authors:  David E Gerber; Drew W Rasco; Celette Sugg Skinner; Jonathan E Dowell; Jingsheng Yan; Jennifer R Sayne; Yang Xie
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.840

9.  Reformed consent: adapting to new media and research participant preferences.

Authors:  James Henry; Barton W Palmer; Lawrence Palinkas; Danielle Kukene Glorioso; Michael P Caligiuri; Dilip V Jeste
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr

10.  A collaborative model for research on decisional capacity and informed consent in older patients with schizophrenia: bioethics unit of a geriatric psychiatry intervention research center.

Authors:  Dilip V Jeste; Laura B Dunn; Barton W Palmer; Elyn Saks; Maureen Halpain; Alison Cook; Paul Appelbaum; Lawrence Schneiderman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-05-27       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.