Literature DB >> 2344855

Informed consent in clinical research with drugs in Spain: perspective of clinical trials committee members.

R Dal-Ré1.   

Abstract

A survey among members of 16 Clinical Trials Committees and the Clinical Trials Evaluation Team of the Spanish Ministry of Health was carried out to discover their opinions about the procedure used to obtain informed consent in clinical research with drugs. The responses of the 111 persons surveyed indicate that 97% consider that informed consent should be obtained before the patient is included in the trial, that it must "always" be in writing (68%), and that the consent form must previously have been approved by the Clinical Trials Committee (87%). The minimum information to be provided to the patient must be read by and later supplied to the subject (76%), and for at least 90% of the members surveyed it must "always" include: an invitation to participate in the clinical trial, information about the purpose, predictable benefits and risks of the trial, the statement that participation is voluntary and that refusal to participate would not imply loss of usual medical care, and that the trial was approved by the Clinical Trials Committee. Only 33% of those surveyed considered that the study design should "always" be described to the patient. In order to find out what the general outlook on this issue is in Spain, it is necessary to perform studies among medical investigators and patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2344855     DOI: 10.1007/bf00315568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  20 in total

1.  Monitoring informed consent procedures: an exploratory record review.

Authors:  Ruth R Faden; Carol Lewis; Barbara Rimer
Journal:  IRB       Date:  1980-10

2.  IRB intervention in the consent process.

Authors:  John A Robertson
Journal:  IRB       Date:  1982-05

3.  The MRC and informed consent.

Authors:  J Glover
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-07-19

4.  Medical research and the human subject. Problems of consent and control in the UK experience.

Authors:  P Byrne
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  The role of the institutional review board in research involving human subjects.

Authors:  J A Bosso
Journal:  Drug Intell Clin Pharm       Date:  1983-11

6.  On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies.

Authors:  B J McNeil; S G Pauker; H C Sox; A Tversky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The consent form as a possible cause of side effects.

Authors:  M G Myers; J A Cairns; J Singer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  The Lugano statements on controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  A L Blum; T C Chalmers; E Deutsch; J Koch-Weser; A Rosén; N Tygstrup; R Zentgraf
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.671

9.  Blinding, unblinding, and the placebo effect: an analysis of patients' guesses of treatment assignment in a double-blind clinical trial.

Authors:  M Moscucci; L Byrne; M Weintraub; C Cox
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Informed consent: the physicians' perspective.

Authors:  K M Taylor; M Kelner
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The ethics of randomised controlled trials from the perspectives of patients, the public, and healthcare professionals.

Authors:  S J Edwards; R J Lilford; J Hewison
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-31

2.  Offering patients entry in clinical trials: preliminary study of the views of prospective participants.

Authors:  F Corbett; J Oldham; R Lilford
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.903

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.